New Computer

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Spindulik+10 July 2004 - 23:01--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Spindulik &#064; 10 July 2004 - 23:01)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-ROSSCO_2004@10 July 2004 - 23:51


I tihnk i have had this argument with you before.

---

Oh. Now it is an argument?

Speed means something, otherwise they wouldn&#39;t be making faster processors. Clock speed? I don&#39;t mess with clock speed or tweaking. I just slap the CPU in and it works better than the previous slower one that I had. I can see the real efficiency of my CPU (compared to the slower one) when I use this software. [/b][/quote]
We&#39;re talking clock speed here.
You say to watch out for AMD processors because they don&#39;t say what the clock speed is.
I said clock speed doesn&#39;t matter at all, it&#39;s the efficiency of the processor that matters, then you go talking bs unrelated to this argument&#092;discussion&#092;whatever-the-fuck you wanna call it about when u buy a new processor you notice the difference with a particular peice of software?

wtf.

Spindulik, please now what the fuck you are talking about before you go and talk out of your ass. All you are doing is showing people that you are a complete fucktard who knows dick all about proccesors.

Clock speed Ghz, it is all the same to me. Who cares. It works.


I am TALKING ABOUT the original subject. The guy is willing to buy a cabinet, but add some new stuff in it too. He has a &#036;1,000 budget. So I cautioned him into not thinking that the AMD 2800 is a 2.8gHz processor, which was my opioion.

That is what I was originally talking about, and it lead to this.

---------------------------------

Now the rest of the off topic comments of fucktards, morons, ass blowing etc... is enough for me to let you guys hash it out on your own and say what you want. -Have fun.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Spindulik@11 July 2004 - 00:53
Clock speed Ghz, it is all the same to me. Who cares. It works.


I am TALKING ABOUT the original subject. The guy is willing to buy a cabinet, but add some new stuff in it too. He has a &#036;1,000 budget. So I cautioned him into not thinking that the AMD 2800 is a 2.8gHz processor, which was my opioion.

That is what I was originally talking about, and it lead to this.

---------------------------------

Now the rest of the off topic comments of fucktards, morons, ass blowing etc... is enough for me to let you guys hash it out on your own and say what you want. -Have fun.

---

I&#39;m sure that Peat Moss is aware that a 2800 Athlon does not have a clock speed of 2.8Ghz.
He is quite a knowledgable man

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kaiweiler+10 July 2004 - 20:55--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler &#064; 10 July 2004 - 20:55)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Spindulik@11 July 2004 - 00:53
Clock speed Ghz, it is all the same to me. Who cares. It works.


I am TALKING ABOUT the original subject. The guy is willing to buy a cabinet, but add some new stuff in it too. He has&nbsp; a &#036;1,000 budget. So I cautioned him into not thinking that the AMD 2800 is a 2.8gHz processor, which was my opioion.

That is what I was originally talking about, and it lead to this.

---------------------------------

Now the rest of the off topic comments of fucktards, morons, ass blowing etc... is enough for me to let you guys hash it out on your own and say what you want.&nbsp; -Have fun.

---

I&#39;m sure that Peat Moss is aware that a 2800 Athlon does not have a clock speed of 2.8Ghz.
He is quite a knowledgable man [/b][/quote]
Wellll, I&#39;ll stay away from the celrons too. :D JK
@Spindulik I&#39;m sure your intentions were good no hard fellings I hope . :)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Spindulik@10 July 2004 - 23:53
Clock speed Ghz, it is all the same to me. Who cares. It works.


I am TALKING ABOUT the original subject. The guy is willing to buy a cabinet, but add some new stuff in it too. He has a &#036;1,000 budget. So I cautioned him into not thinking that the AMD 2800 is a 2.8gHz processor, which was my opioion.

That is what I was originally talking about, and it lead to this.

---------------------------------

Now the rest of the off topic comments of fucktards, morons, ass blowing etc... is enough for me to let you guys hash it out on your own and say what you want. -Have fun.

---

Now you aren&#39;t making any sense, please stop making up stuff when u have no clue what u are talking about.

The 2800+ is NOT 2.8ghz, it is equivelent in performance to a pentium 4 which runs at a clock speed of 2.8ghz, but is NOT 2.8ghz.

You clearly do not understand how processors work (even i don&#39;t enirely but i can admit it).



And why are you cautioning him into not thinking that the amd 2800 is 2.8ghz, why does that matter? It has nothing to do with the perofrmance he will see fropm the process, because they do not relate for amd processors.

Besides, peatmoss is a smart guy, im sure he already knows this (acutally might not, i understand he knows more about intel...)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by peat moss+11 July 2004 - 00:56--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (peat moss @ 11 July 2004 - 00:56)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kaiweiler@10 July 2004 - 20:55
<!--QuoteBegin-Spindulik

---

Quote:

---

@11 July 2004 - 00:53
Clock speed Ghz, it is all the same to me. Who cares. It works.


I am TALKING ABOUT the original subject. The guy is willing to buy a cabinet, but add some new stuff in it too. He has&nbsp; a &#036;1,000 budget. So I cautioned him into not thinking that the AMD 2800 is a 2.8gHz processor, which was my opioion.

That is what I was originally talking about, and it lead to this.

---------------------------------

Now the rest of the off topic comments of fucktards, morons, ass blowing etc... is enough for me to let you guys hash it out on your own and say what you want.&nbsp; -Have fun.

---

I&#39;m sure that Peat Moss is aware that a 2800 Athlon does not have a clock speed of 2.8Ghz.
He is quite a knowledgable man

---

Wellll, I&#39;ll stay away from the celrons too. :D [/b][/quote]
:lol: Good choice&#33;
Athlon XP would be agood choice, or P4, but P4 is plenty more expensive usually.
Although in your link, they are relativley the same price, either would suffice.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kaiweiler+10 July 2004 - 21:00--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler @ 10 July 2004 - 21:00)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Quote:

---

Originally posted by peat moss@11 July 2004 - 00:56

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kaiweiler@10 July 2004 - 20:55
<!--QuoteBegin-Spindulik

---

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

@11 July 2004 - 00:53
Clock speed Ghz, it is all the same to me. Who cares. It works.


I am TALKING ABOUT the original subject. The guy is willing to buy a cabinet, but add some new stuff in it too. He has&nbsp; a &#036;1,000 budget. So I cautioned him into not thinking that the AMD 2800 is a 2.8gHz processor, which was my opioion.

That is what I was originally talking about, and it lead to this.

---------------------------------

Now the rest of the off topic comments of fucktards, morons, ass blowing etc... is enough for me to let you guys hash it out on your own and say what you want.&nbsp; -Have fun.

---

I&#39;m sure that Peat Moss is aware that a 2800 Athlon does not have a clock speed of 2.8Ghz.
He is quite a knowledgable man

---

Wellll, I&#39;ll stay away from the celrons too. :D

---

:lol: Good choice&#33;
Athlon XP would be agood choice, or P4, but P4 is plenty more expensive usually.
Although in your link, they are relativley the same price, either would suffice. [/b][/quote]
Kai thats what confused me . Thought Amd would be a liitle cheaper . I guess the high end stuff has a price ? :)

Oh ya, to finally answer your question peat, i say go with the 7095. They are both the exact same system with different motherboard and processor.
I&#39;d rather have the 64bit because, well, i wanna try windows xp 64bit, there will be more 64bit software soon too, meaning the 64bit processors will have better performance in these apps than in the 32bt written apps.

But, if u don&#39;t cure for that, then the P4 is the same price so u could go for that too.

Really it&#39;s up to you.

oh, the prices are same between the two becuase ti is only AMD&#39;s 32bit processors which are cheap, the 64bit ones are prices right up there with intel&#39;s...

edit2: one last thing, i&#39;d take that 5600 out and put in your 9700pro instead, much better performance. :) put the 5600 in your daughter&#39;s comp.

Generally it&#39;s the Athlon XP&#39;s that are a lot cheaper from AMD then going the P4 route. However the Athlon 64&#39;s are actually quite similar price wise to the P4&#39;s.

EDIT and I agree with Rossco, I&#39;d say go for the 64bit. Even if it doesn&#39;t give you any benefits now, chances are it will down the road.