Adster prob. doesn't like FPS games, in which case yes, the PS2 is more superior (except for GTA3 and Vice City, they're are far better on the xbox). I'm just guessing here, I'm not implying anthing.
Printable View
Adster prob. doesn't like FPS games, in which case yes, the PS2 is more superior (except for GTA3 and Vice City, they're are far better on the xbox). I'm just guessing here, I'm not implying anthing.
FOR ME yesQuote:
Originally Posted by cpt_azad
but each individual is different
I was watching Thescreensavers and they were talking about the cell chip today. Samething were talking about. They were saying that the processor will make games more like a cgi movie then crappy pixels and jagged lines.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent Smith
I also read this somewhere. They were saying how PS3's games will be a lot like CGI cutscenes, honestly if that's the case, I can't wait. And this just makes me scratch my head and wonder, WTF does Microsoft have up their sleeves :wacko: :ermm:
You guy's also forget that sony wanted to put 4 cell chips in the ps3. So it would be four Cell chips running in tandem, so that would put the ps3 past 1 Terraflop.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpt_azad
money
Shit technology is going to keep growing in a minute we will be able to put r selves into the games and play that will be the day huh.
corrrrrrrrrectQuote:
Originally Posted by cpt_azad
yeah pretty much right
Ya gotta read man. I never said squat about 4ghz.Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent Smith
The PS2 was a good system at the time and even the hype mobile about it running some server crap or it being a security breach or some shit.
ALL HYPED UP :shit:. :dry:
On another note, most folks that rag on Xbox, have barely played the system.
When I hear folk say it has no good games then I know they do not know what they are talking about....especially when many good PS2 games are also.....Xbox games...but unrefutably better. :dry:
does anybody know what its going to be the price for the ps3 or Xbox 360 or at least have an estimate?