Re: Mystery solved.... disappointing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
Do you think that given the fact that there was an attempted cover up utilising the CIA (simplified) that the media was the surest way of achieving the result ?
Whatever his reasons for the way he did it or even why he did it the important thing is that corruption of any kind is not tolerated and doesn't go unnoticed or unpunished.
Public outrage can be a far stronger weapon in the fight against corruption than any court.
A grand jury would have easily solved the issue; the justice department could not have quashed testimony given to a bunch of pissed-off citizens who are looking to endict anything that moves.
Had the man gone before a Grand Jury, he could have even testified incognito with a legal stipulation as to his bona fides; such things happen all the time.
The public outrage would have followed in very short order.
Being what he was, he probably knew the witness protection program isnt exactly airtight :ph34r:
Re: Mystery solved.... disappointing?
this was one of our questions in a test we had for every class. the winning class got unlimited snacks and drinks during the last school assembly. it was a big deal for the USa
Re: Mystery solved.... disappointing?
Re: Mystery solved.... disappointing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by clocker
G. Gordon Liddy agrees with your assessment.
Now there's a guy who would know.
G. Gordon Liddy? there's an oasis of sensible thought. a guy who advises shooting any federal agent who sets foot on your property... who also happens to be a former federal agent who got caught... um... committing burglary.
