Re: London Bomb's (Part II)
The suspect trips when running into the train. He is pounced upon by three 'policemen', he is shot in the head five times.
Extracts from 'news as it happens;
The police tried to revive him. (I bet they did)
They had a helicopter ambulance immediately at the scene. (there are a lot of helicopter ambulances on the tube:unsure:)
I thought that the woman newscaster was trying to 'put' words into the witnesses mouths. 'Are you sure he tripped or did the 'police' push him'?
Let's hope it was one of the culprits.
Sadly they wont be able to interview him to get information on the rest.
The police said that they would shoot to kill. It appears that they are now doing just that.
Re: London Bomb's (Part II)
i hope CCTV footage gets realesed
that clown jumped the barrier wearing a thick padded jacket (on a sunnyday)
he was asking for it bomb or not
and yep the cops have been ordered to shoot to kill bomb suspects
Re: London Bomb's (Part II)
Serves him right. If armed police tell you to stop then you stop unless you really, really have something to hide, its not rocket science is it?
Point blank execution, I like :01:
Its not like they just shot him for falling over, they had been chasing him through the station ffs
Re: London Bomb's (Part II)
Yes, he won't make that mistake again... :ph34r:
Re: London Bomb's (Part II)
And apparently he's not connected with anything..
oops
Re: London Bomb's (Part II)
They haven't he said he wasn't connected at all, they just said he wasn't one of the 4 men they had CCTV footage of
Re: London Bomb's (Part II)
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
They bundled some Asian guy to the floor of a tube train and shot him, point blank, 5 times.
JUST IN CASE, no doubt.
;)
Re: London Bomb's (Part II)
the guy that was killed wasn't a terrorist :ohmy:
Re: London Bomb's (Part II)
Quote:
LONDON (AP) - The man shot and killed on a subway car by London police in front of horrified commuters apparently had nothing to do with this month's bombings on the city's transit system, police said Saturday in expressing their ``regrets.''
A day earlier, the police commissioner said the man was ``directly linked'' to Thursday's attacks, in which bombs on three subway trains and a bus failed to detonate properly. No one was injured.
``For somebody to lose their life in such circumstances is a tragedy and one that the Metropolitan Police Service regrets,'' a police spokesman said on customary condition of anonymity.
Source
You were saying Dan? :rolleyes:
:ph34r:
Re: London Bomb's (Part II)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Faced
Quote:
LONDON (AP) - The man shot and killed on a subway car by London police in front of horrified commuters apparently had nothing to do with this month's bombings on the city's transit system, police said Saturday in expressing their ``regrets.''
A day earlier, the police commissioner said the man was ``directly linked'' to Thursday's attacks, in which bombs on three subway trains and a bus failed to detonate properly. No one was injured.
``For somebody to lose their life in such circumstances is a tragedy and one that the Metropolitan Police Service regrets,'' a police spokesman said on customary condition of anonymity.
Source
You were saying Dan? :rolleyes:
:ph34r:
I disagree RF. This fellow if not guilty of the bombings was guilty of something else. Why else would he try to evade the police? By running away from the police he was making the police think that he was guilty. This gave them every right to take the action that they did.
So an 'innocent' person is killed, if so that is regrettable. Hundreds of innocent people are being killed in the bombings. I say carry on with the shoot to kill policy. It will reap dividends in the end.
