Printable View
I dont understand the "safe" argument. FTN invites maybe rare but they're not impossible to get. If authorities or whoever want to get in, they can buy their way in with invites. I'm sure there are plenty of users who would part with their invites for the right price. There's a price for everything and it wouldn't take them long to join the community if they wanted. Just being realistic.
Safe probably as in "low target".
Pay2Leech (which is seen as profiting from other peoples work in MPAA/RIAA eyes)/large user base are usually big targets for legal action.
oh hey brandon
So many FTNers here, I'm so envious %)
SCC doesnt have all the categories therefore it can't be the only 0day tracker some one will use. Also, IRC channel is dead, cause there's no community there. But it's very good for an average user without Xbox 360.
That's exactly what i meant.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon
The other dude is basically saying that torrentspy is just as safe as any other tracker which is absolutely wrong.
With a million users at piratebay chances are MPAA won't notice you.Quote:
Originally Posted by deuce6000That's exactly what i meant.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon
The other dude is basically saying that torrentspy is just as safe as any other tracker which is absolutely wrong.
depends on how active of a download and/or uploader you are
afaik, they don't go for the "top pirates" at the trackers, they just terrorize random people they can get they're hands on.Quote:
Originally Posted by th0r
Yeah i think that's the way it is too.Quote:
Originally Posted by AugustoPafaik, they don't go for the "top pirates" at the trackers, they just terrorize random people they can get they're hands on.Quote:
Originally Posted by th0r
im not comparing torrentspy to ftn but one private tracker like scc or sct to ftn. since ppl said ftn is better because its saferQuote:
Originally Posted by AugustoPWith a million users at piratebay chances are MPAA won't notice you.Quote:
Originally Posted by deuce6000
There's no point in comparing SCC to FTN.
It is like comparing a donkey with a Ferrari lol
Sure Ftn is far away the vest community non Pay to leech non pay to invite what else do you want?
Scc All Day
SCC lacks some sections completely, so it's worse than TL in terms of content.
FTN is probaly best but SCC is still alrite IMO.
There is a bright future ahead of SCC.
What a stupid, stupid discussion.
What's the point of this thread, anyway?
Listen man im special to :whistling next time i require an invite give me one :naughty:Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon
Seriosuly tho its a hard pick between the two but i do find myself using scc alot more then i do ftn mainly for the speeds and the pre-times its very easy to seed back, half the time by the time ive finished downloading ive already seeded back which aint to shabby. All in all id say scc :)
SCC's content is really bad when it comes for old files in general even tho i dont have FTN I would think FTN may be better in terms of older files since they have been here much longer then SCC. However SCC does have potential to be a very good tracker in the future.
scc i think
SCC have better pre-times, FTN has better retention and better speed overall
SCC is the best!
why?Quote:
Originally Posted by zagor
Because he doesn't have FTN! :)I don't have FTN either, so I won't comment which of the two trackers is the best one. But SCC is very good.Quote:
Originally Posted by Torrent_Geekwhy?Quote:
Originally Posted by zagor
Registered users 13,991 / 14,000Quote:
Originally Posted by fstrulz
FasterQuote:
Originally Posted by Torrent_Geekwhy?Quote:
Originally Posted by zagor
I am USING FTN dode :)Quote:
Originally Posted by fstemonBecause he doesn't have FTN! :)I don't have FTN either, so I won't comment which of the two trackers is the best one. But SCC is very good.Quote:
Originally Posted by Torrent_Geek
It is not my account but I am using it! I can not tell more than that ;)
FTN is not as great as people make it out to be. But its pretimes are very close to SCC, I think its the second fastest. SCT FTW, nah maybe TL!!!!!
Brandon come check this out :happy:Quote:
Originally Posted by zagor
Go cry to your mama instead!Quote:
Originally Posted by beatBrandon come check this out :happy:Quote:
Originally Posted by zagor
http://image.bayimg.com/dagceaabj.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by lightsout
When it comes to pre-times ScT isnt all that great. Its pre-times are mostly >5min. But content-wise its better than any tracker I'm on. So I cant say anything about FTN but compared to SCC ScT isnt that great, pre-times wise ofcourse.
Why cant you just let people enjoy the small battles that they do win in life. Life is hard enough as it is w/o others making it any less enjoyable.Quote:
Originally Posted by beat
You love kissing his ass dont you? :yup:Quote:
Originally Posted by beatBrandon come check this out :happy:Quote:
Originally Posted by zagor
Yes he does :) and maybe he is looking for something more! :angry:Quote:
Originally Posted by _coder_You love kissing his ass dont you? :yup:Quote:
Originally Posted by beat
Yup I'm looking for you to get banned for sharing an account.
People like you are the scum of the earth.Quote:
Originally Posted by beat
I have both, I actually joined SCC just to see what the hoopla was all about. Well FTN does indeed have faster pre-times most of the time. SCC's is tweaked by several minutes, for one thing their clock is off by several minutes. If you have FTN, just test them side by side. For those of you that want to believe SCC has "THE" fastest pre-times ever, more power to you. I just know what I have seen with "MY OWN EYES". :whistling
Their clock is off by ~30 secs according to this page: http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/cgi-bin/timer.plQuote:
Originally Posted by sense
Can you please provide an example?Quote:
Originally Posted by sense
What have you been smoking? How can PreTimes depend on the server clock? We have 900 more wins then ANY site, and we will not stop. Just because we literally crush every site on 0sec/day material doesn't mean we cheat. Just because your shitty site uses 100MBIT transfers doesn't mean we are that slow. Next time you open your mouth think about it, not once, but twice. We are going to expand our categories soon, so just wait and see.
edit: If in doubt, please check #Tracers / #TRchat at irc.p2pirc.org. We are currently listed as #1 ;)
ftn of course...
Was this directed towards me? First off I don't run a site, so check your glasses, unless you are calling FTN a shitty site? Second, I never said the server clock depended on the pretime. I just brought it up so people would check the torrent added date/time + server time to get an idea when comparing to other sites. Many times people just look at the listed pretime, a lot of pre db's have different times, so it's not highly accurate. I go by what I can actually load into my client from irc. Anyways good luck with the site, it does have fast pretimes but it is a bit overblown. Personally, I just don't feel very secure on the site. To me community+security is above everything else. Please understand, I am not trying to make scc look bad or anything. So, best of luck to you and SCC in the future. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Chalisto
FTN:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyl3KK
Death.Proof.UNRATED.DVDR-Replica (Uploaded 13m, 54s after pre.) on the site @ 2007-08-31 around 22:29:27 EST
Death.Proof.DVDRip.XviD-DMT (Uploaded 5m, 9s after pre.) on the site @ 2007-08-30 around 12:14:08 EST
SCC:
Death.Proof.UNRATED.DVDR-Replica (pretime not found) on the site @ 2007-09-01 around 22:26:06 EST
Death.Proof.DVDRip.XviD-DMT (Uploaded 3h 55m, 46s after pre) on the site @ 2007-08-30 16:54:34 EST
If more examples are needed please look them up yourself.