http://moderation.forumflash.com/sty...efault/BBQ.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
Printable View
http://moderation.forumflash.com/sty...efault/BBQ.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
Meh, aim lower. Also it looked a bit fresian to me as I didn't look too close.Quote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
No-one got me Arthur Andersen joke last night, either :geptard:
I still don't get it.:(Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
I don't get the joke either.
No I wasn't, you have the excuse of finding it all a bit tiresome cause it's emulating your kiddies.Quote:
Originally Posted by *goddess*
Also you did post :blink: :lol:
Nighty, night http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/images/icons/icon11.gif
I think Dan got it cause he said it was shit :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
I'm not sure if he got the joke tho'
:blushing: Yeah, but I usually don't post.
:rolleyes: You have got a point tonight tho.
:helpsmili You're dead right on the rugrats, I come in here to get away from that stuff:lol:
:1eye: Really gone now.
porn
:01::01::01::01::01:
Manker, I totally agree, that if you have a child that has access to a computer, that computer should be locked down with a safeguard. In most cases, these are foolproof. However, Net Nanny only works with IE and with Netscape. Sometimes it works with Firefox. I do know this from experience, as my friend's son has recently started browsing porn and I installed this software for him, and the son, who is 12, has easily gotten around it by installing different browsers which are not compliant with Net Nanny. This is also only a safeguard when the kids are in their own house, for example, when my son leaves the safety of our computer and goes to one of his friends houses, I can't be sure what's on there and what's not.
I don't agree with the moderators having to be a babysitting service - parents "should" have more control over what their kids are doing on the net. However, as a board that allows membership to anyone aged 13 and up, the rules were put in place because many of the members are younger. There is also the fact that guests are allowed to view posts and click links - and guests can be any age. The point is, topless pics and links are allowed, full frontal is not. I'm getting sick of seeing it as well - and have reported it when I have seen it left for so long. It's not only the pictures on this most recent site (which this guy had posted several links to) that concerned me, but the links on those sites and the advertisements. It goes from full frontal to full penetration among other things.
As far as Jonno posting his pic - I was a mod at the time, and when he did it, he received warnings from both myself and Lamsey even after he removed the pic himself. He is right in saying that it was only up for 4 minutes. He learned his lesson, and hasn't posted it again. I don't find it at all hypocritical that he gets upset when other people get away with something he got in shit for. I would too.
Nikki, If you don't give them administrator access they wouldn't be able to install FF. Net Nanny works just fine. I do take your point about while in other people's houses tho' - that is a more difficult issue.
My points were far from it being fine to post porn here, I do not want to see it while at fst. However it is inevitable that porn will be posted here because of the moderate approach of the team, the availability of interweb porn and the abundance of folk who think posting it is cool.
Therefore it is inevitable that kids will see full frontal nudity if they browse this forum or others like it. It is only the parents who can stop their child from seeing porn at fst. As you say, it is not the mods responsibility -- neither is it your's or Jonno's.
Lastly if Jonno is pissed because he got into trouble for doing something and he sees others are getting away with it then that is understandable. Personally it wouldn't bother me but I can see that it would irk some folk, but that wasn't the point.
The hypocritical element occurs when a moral stance is taken.
True, without administrator access, kids can't install other software - but not everyone runs XP/2000. Setting policies and profiles in 98 is a little more difficult, and there are still a lot of people using it unfortunately.
I don't pretend to be taking a moral stance on it - as someone who's had their own pics posted here time and time again, albeit not by me. :lol: As someone who knows Jonno well though, and has for a long time, I suppose I see it more as a change of heart than a moral high horse. Speaking from my knowledge of him, if this had been a year and a half ago, he probably would have laughed at the links and not said another word.
Manker, please explain which bit of "It is against the rules" you are having difficulty understanding.
It doesn't matter a toss whether it bothers you or not, it doesn't matter whether you think parents should vet what their kids browse. The fact is that it isn't going to be on here.
I've seen numerous "reported posts" from those who have criticised Jonno's stance, including some from yourself. That is hypocrisy.
:lol: :lol:
I have never seen those damn pics altho' someone seems to mention them every other day!!1!1
I'll accept your word about Jonno merely growing up a bit and not just firing up his moral steed since you know him much better than me - it just appears that he is sometimes, ya know ;)
Which bit of my posts saying that I don't wish to see pron posted here do YOU not understand.Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
I'm merely posting my view on the subject, which is that porn posted here is inevitable and people that moan about it should not be moaning to the mod team about kiddies seeing it because the parents are to blame.
Also I have never reported a post which contained porn. Ever.
I think I've used the report button three times ever. You most certainly are mistaken.
By the way, Nice flame :)
It was Big Daddy using a different username right?
No, I don't think it was. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
@manker - there was nothing major posted, seriously - I think maybe one topless pic, in all the rest I was mostly covered. Ask around though, I'm sure someone has them. :lol:
:lol: :blushing:
Normally I am quite reserved but I may make an exception in this case.
Thanks for the, erm, heads up :D
Seeing you decided to make part of your PM public, I'll make my reply to that part public too.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
I didn't say you reported porn posts, I said you've reported posts, presumably because you thought they were inappropriate, and that is exactly what Jonno did. To criticise someone for doing the same as you have done is hypocrisy, that's the definition of the word, go and look it up.
So it isn't a flame, it is showing you up for what you are. :P
No, it definitely wasn't Big Daddy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
What are you talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
I made that post before the PM.
I copied my PM to you from this post as I wanted to say other things to you too. Check the times.
Here is the PM I was about to send to you:
===========
Everyone had given up. Nikki addressed me in her post so I responded. Politely.
I'm not bothered if you think that I was being spiteful to Jonno, sometimes I think he is an arse and I post to that effect. I have no problem if people think the same about me and post it. Like you just did.
Of course that process often makes them appear to be an arse too, eh :)
Also I've never reported anything that I thought was inappropriate. The reasons I've used the report button is for questions pertaining to my posts. Asking for title rectifications or why posts were deleted.
Yes. You were wrong to call me a hypocrite. I think you're one of the better mods but you let yourself down a bit today.
Feel free to apologise but in truth I don't care either way. This pm will not go any further from my account, btw.
Report system = private no one knows
Public ranting = fair game
:)
edit - and if you read the thread properly you will see that Jonno wasn't being lambasted for ranting agaist porn, he was being lambasted for lecturing on decency when he himself has in the past posted indecent images hence the hypocrisy
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by me
Maybe I should have deleted that bit :D
Manker, my apologies, I've checked back and you are quite correct.
But I can't say that about the others though.
So are you saying people can't change their opinions? That once they've said/done something they are stuck with that for the rest of their lives?Quote:
Originally Posted by DanB
For your own sake, I hope you are wrong.
Thanks for that. Despite my bluster I do appreciate it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
Yes if you do something bad. People have long memories and remember things.
nearly 5 years ago I did something wrong and I am stuck with it for the rest of my life, and it would be hypocritical for me to preach about it to some one else who was in that position.
Why though, Dan? Perhaps instead of saying "I can't preach," you could be saying "I speak from experience." Everyone has a right to change opinions, there's nothing hypocritical about that.
I was a heavy drinker/drug user in my younger years. I don't do much of either now. Does that mean that I'm hypocritical in posting the opinion that it's a dangerous thing to do? I don't think so, I think it means that I made a mistake, and learned from it.
Yeah that was awesome. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon L. Obscene
:lol: Cool :D
Ok I just would like to clear a couple of points if no one minds :)
First: I'm not pissed off that I got wrong and others did'nt, I merely making a point :)
Second: My whole point was this is against the rules, net nanny or not or whatever, it's still against the rules.
Third: Yes I posted my pic but as Nikki said that was a long time ago and I have changed and realised some things, I was acused of pedophilia for posting that pic, kinda scared me off posting anything sexual for a while and seriously upset me. I made 1 mistake which actually did no harm at the time, bad reactions came from those who did'nt even see it, I think Nikki, Lamsey, RF, Bob, Gurahl and maybe a couple of others saw it.
Dan you said about your past, you only live with that from those that don't know you, I've never met you but would happily say I trust you and think you are a good man with a good sense of morals who would never be maliscious (yeah I know, can't be arsed to look it up) , you also know me fairly well I would like to think I have the right to say I was wrong (which I now have done several times) and change my stance, I certainly don't judge you for your past, why judge me?
As I've said, the links posted in the last few days have not offended me personally, I was merely looking out for those who were offended, I'm a protective type of person I can't help that and will always step in to stop a fight or someone getting hurt or offended, I don't consider myself any higher or more important than anyone here nor was I trying to be a mod, no more than those who have ever said "This should be posted in a different forum" , no different, I reported this thread, first time I've reported anything for a while, I normally do it in public so I can't be acused of sneaking round.
Bottom line it was against the rules.
Bottom line I've admitted to being wrong when I done it.
Interesting reading this thread :D
Jonno :cool:
Meh. You can't have two bottom lines.
If your whole point was that it was against the rules, how on earth could you have been merely looking out for those that may have been offended.
Ffs, writing 'I can't be arsed to look it up' would take more time that actually looking malicious up :angry:
;)
Good post.
My wife has two lines on her bottom. I think.:rolleyes: Elastic too tight.:ph34r:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
:lol:
If she's only got two, Boab, she's doing well.
My Mam tells me that her knickers have seen more lines than Edna Krabappel's chalkboard :D
:lol: :lol: Not big Edna?:ph34r:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
:lol: I thought of lines on the bum too.
:unsure: I got told again I've got the nicest arse around the other day, sounds flattering sorta but then I thought.... hmmmm my arse is my best feature??
:ph34r: Is that like: If my dog had a face like yours I'd shave it's arse and teach it to walk backwards:lol: :blink:
:frusty: Good spelling:rolleyes:
Your insult couldn't stick to manker so you choose to insult others instead...?Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
Tool.
:lol: LMAO!! I done that on purpose cos I knew it would wind you up :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Nice one dude :D
@Janey.....:lol: Thats really cruel :lol:Quote:
Is that like: If my dog had a face like yours I'd shave it's arse and teach it to walk backwards
Jonno :cool:
:dry: Are you saying I should walk backwards git?
I thought you did that anyway :P
Jonno :cool:
:shifty: Your arse is lookin for a whoopin and no you won't enjoy this.
My arse can't look, it only has 1 eye and it's blind :lol:
My arse, someone find me a pic of Jim royal :lol:
Jonno :cool:
Show us your arse and we'll let you know ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by *goddess*
EDIT:
Janey, i only posted that coz Jonno was too chickenshit to post it himself ;)