Re: What Trackers are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shinigami
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fatcat69
Heres my list for edit:
TL---Lvl 2 or 3 (150k members...cmon people.)
ScL---Lvl 5 (only 50 members have a chance of actually getting invites, under 2k members))
iTS ---Lvl 5 (only 10 people outside of staff have invites at the moment, under 1k members, have the list right in front of me)
AOM---Lvl 6 (people dont even try to ask for invites anymore, its just as hard as BH and NB to get into)
FL---above whatever TL is because FL has no invites and has less users (rarer)
Swedvdr--on the plate to move up in the next few weeks to lvl8
FSC/FTN/ScT/PT all stay where they are.
Reactions to you:
TL---Lvl 4: Although there are 150.000 users, only a few users are here of that amount. The invites were given away easily but upon closure, everybody wants to keep his TL account because it is good and easy to seed. So stay.
ScL---Lvl 5: I agree. Lets see how ScL moves up in the future, for now it is definetly worth level 5. If things keep the same, maybe level 6, depends on how ScL develops.
iTS---Lvl 5: Don't know much about it. But a lot of people want an account or invite. Seeing account trading is forbidden you often don't notice it in threads, until you receive pms...
AOM---Lvl 4: Just as hard as to get into. Oke, but why do people want it? For magic, or for trading? You should ask that question. I would move it to level 4, to see if requests start increasing. If not then its pure for the level.
FL---above TL: No, FL doesn't offer as much as TL + Torrents have a TTL which sucks. The torrents on FL are also on TL + a lot more. + I do not see any users requesting for FL. I recently got one for free.
Swedvdr: Is good where it is.
The levels are not based on content but rarity. Please understand how levels are before addressing my suggestions.
FL has less users, absolutely no invites...
if you have 10lbs in one bag and 50lbs in another...which was more?
levels are rarity...if a tracker has less accounts and no invites, then it is rarer then a tracker that has nearly triple the accounts and has over 30k invites out.
Thats just simple fact. TL has high demand now bc everyone knows there are 30k invites lying around, it will soon be bigger then bitsoup if it already isn't. Even revtt has less then 1/3 the members of TL ....You treat TL like there are only 10k users there...when there are over 150k users.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shinigami
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WTAW
made some changes, should be better ;)
Don't understand why AOM is level 6.... If it ain't sought, why move it up?
According to that logic, since noone is asking for u*-* it should go down a few levels?
People arent asking for it because they know you wont get it by posting on a public forum, just like you wont get FTN or FSC by making a request thread saying "I have a dream of being in FTN/FSC"
Most high level trackers look down upon public forums offering invites, infact thats why ScL, iTS redid their invite systems...mainly due to invite traders on this forum and others.
Re: What Trackers are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
You are right. Was judging not only from rarity, sorry!
Re: What Trackers are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shinigami
You are right. Was judging not only from rarity, sorry!
No worries, see thats why TL has a [10] because it does have nearly everything. With such a large user base, that is one of the pluses.
Re: What Trackers are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
I think music-vids should go up 1 more time to lv 5/6 even PU dont have an invites and there are about 1700 members :)
Re: What Trackers are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
TL - Lvl4 is nice.
AOM - Should be atleast lvl6 or lvl7 ( Only 700 users )
iTS - Lvl6 atleast. Only 900 members, invites were reseted ( only a few users have invites )
ScL - Lvl5. Hard to get invites, trade is forbidden
FTN - Lvl9, invites are closed for now, only a few users have it.
E**** - Lvl10, no invites and few users
elektronik - Lvl6, invites closed ( only old users have it ) and not many users
SweDVDR - Lvl8, Only a few users have invites, small UserDB.
TranceTraffic - Invites closed, only really old users have 1.
BTMusic - Lvl4 atleast, very hard to get into.
Re: What Trackers are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
Re: What Trackers are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WTAW
made some changes, should be better ;)
very good changes u made there:)
Re: What Trackers are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Forumas
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WTAW
made some changes, should be better ;)
very good changes u made there:)
I agree with forumas...everything looks up to date and right on the ball. :happy:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wormtail
TL - Lvl4 is nice.
AOM - Should be atleast lvl6 or lvl7 ( Only 700 users )
iTS - Lvl6 atleast. Only 900 members, invites were reseted ( only a few users have invites )
ScL - Lvl5. Hard to get invites, trade is forbidden
FTN - Lvl9, invites are closed for now, only a few users have it.
E**** - Lvl10, no invites and few users
elektronik - Lvl6, invites closed ( only old users have it ) and not many users
SweDVDR - Lvl8, Only a few users have invites, small UserDB.
TranceTraffic - Invites closed, only really old users have 1.
BTMusic - Lvl4 atleast, very hard to get into.
The rankings were redone...take a look see.
FTN wont go up atm, more users have invites there then at iTS and ScL combined.
iTS only has 10 users that have invites outside of the staff
And the staff at ScL has locked down as well.
Right now, rankings our good....I personally just didnt want to see TL go anywhere upwards...when you give out 30k invites...that usually makes you go down seeing how the top 5 trackers combined dont have half the members that TL has.
Re: What Trackers are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
people are happy with the ranking OMG :O
:lol:
Re: What Trackers are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WTAW
people are happy with the ranking OMG :O
:lol:
Or just tired of arguing like me:unsure: