Printable View
solicitation
n 1: an entreaty addressed to someone of superior status; "a solicitation to the king for relief" 2: request for a sum of money (as in church) [syn: appeal, collection, ingathering] 3: the act of enticing a person to do something wrong (as an offer of sex in return for money) [syn: allurement]
What she said ...
B)
2:37 amQuote:
...what time is it in Australia ..
No.Quote:
..isn't it a bit early to be having a friend round ...
Quote:
... and how come your checking posts on the internet at the same time?
Cos I'm clever.
B)
Maybe this thread should be respectfully returned to the lounge, it could do it some good.
Well J2,
I guess it is official. Among Billy's illiterate friends, you are considered a "wanker". It is 2:37 a.m. and he has illiterate friends over. We call them prostitutes here in the states. I guess it has not dawned on old sausage boy, that when you used the word "solicitation", definition #3 was obvious and implied.
solicitation- 3: the act of enticing a person to do something wrong (as an offer of sex in return for money) [syn: allurement]
BTW: Did you get the "Around the world package"? You type naughty messages to ILW and J2 across the sea, then read her the responses aloud, while she wanks you. Something tells me that tip money may have been involved in her reply.
J2- EBP is from the UK, Billy Dean and Echidna are from Australia, don't forget myfiles3000 from Canada
I happen to agree with Billy on the school issue, though. Nobody is going to cram my kids head full of crap but me.
Hobbes.
You, Hobbes, have just proved to the world what an arsehole you are. I was on the phone to a dear friend of mine, a respected mother of teenagers. J2's post came up and I read it out to her, that was her response, quite rightly too, he accused me of browbeating my kids, something she knows is not true.Quote:
I guess it is official. Among Billy's illiterate friends, you are considered a "wanker". It is 2:37 a.m. and he has illiterate friends over. We call them prostitutes here in the states. I guess it has not dawned on old sausage boy, that when you used the word "solicitation", definition #3 was obvious and implied.
solicitation- 3: the act of enticing a person to do something wrong (as an offer of sex in return for money) [syn: allurement]
BTW: Did you get the "Around the world package"? You type naughty messages to ILW and J2 across the sea, then read her the responses aloud, while she wanks you. Something tells me that tip money may have been involved in her reply.
You then call her an illiterate prostitute. She will be on later, she can then call you all the c*nts you deserve to be called.
I had a certain amount of respect for you Hobbes, that has now completely disappeared.
Hobbes,Quote:
Originally posted by Billy_Dean@18 September 2003 - 05:02
Hobbes.
You, Hobbes, have just proved to the world what an arsehole you are. I was on the phone to a dear friend of mine, a respected mother of teenagers. J2's post came up and I read it out to her, that was her response, quite rightly too, he accused me of browbeating my kids, something she knows is not true.Quote:
I guess it is official. Among Billy's illiterate friends, you are considered a "wanker". It is 2:37 a.m. and he has illiterate friends over. We call them prostitutes here in the states. I guess it has not dawned on old sausage boy, that when you used the word "solicitation", definition #3 was obvious and implied.
solicitation- 3: the act of enticing a person to do something wrong (as an offer of sex in return for money) [syn: allurement]
BTW: Did you get the "Around the world package"? You type naughty messages to ILW and J2 across the sea, then read her the responses aloud, while she wanks you. Something tells me that tip money may have been involved in her reply.
You then call her an illiterate prostitute. She will be on later, she can then call you all the c*nts you deserve to be called.
I had a certain amount of respect for you Hobbes, that has now completely disappeared.
Where do I start.........
Firstly I am far from illiterate and secondly, and most importantly, I am NOT and I repeat NOT a prostitute.
I stand by what I said.......J2 is a wanker, a first class one at that.
You, Hobbes, on the other hand are obnoxious. I liken you to cat sh*t, looks OK on the outside, but step on it and you find that something evil lies inside.
I do believe you owe me an apology.
Did you two actually notice my signature had changed? That was not random. I was putting together the circumstances in the most humorous and OTT way possible and I was able to tie in the word "solicitation" to boot, in a rather seamless fashion, I might add.
All in all, I thought it was one of my better efforts. You have to admit that I tied the circumstances into a rather tight and believable package. It is a shame that people who freely fling arrows at others, then ask them where their senses of humor are, are so easily and deeply wounded by return fire.
Lighten up, don't take yourselves so seriously and if you don't like being teased, then don't provoke it. I mean, you wished me many more 9/11's and I didn't flame you, why would I do so now about something that doesn't concern me? You should pick up on this incongruity.
See Billy, you guys flamed me, I just quenched them and moved on. I told you I lead by example.
CWG: I apologize to you because we are strangers and you had no way of knowing my true intent. In addition, I have no ego problem with saying I am sorry. I guess phone sex is not technically called "prostitution". <_< (yes, that's a joke).
Actually, I consider myself more like wine than catshit, an aquired taste.
Her is a little nonsense to lighten your moods (credit to 4play): http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail77.html
I love it when people, who are happy to abuse and name-call others get onto the moral high ground and demand an apology when someone is "nasty" to them.
I also love it when people talk about what they are and aren't as if others should know this. The only way people know you here is thro' what you write and how you write it. So if someone forms an opinion of you it is based on your own words.
As an aside it appears in the modern world that Christian bashing is more acceptabe than any other religion bashing. However this only appears to be the case in "Christian countries". It appears that people can say pretty much what they want about followers of Christ and that is OK, however if one makes comment on Faiths such as Islam one is immediately branded a racist or some such thing.
Well I am a Catholic, I find your comments about my brainwashing personally offensive. I am not hard wired with anything. I am a rational person who has made up his own mind. I do not believe or follow all the teachings of the Catholic Church. However I do believe enough of them (particularly the important ones) to continue to describe myself as a Catholic.
I also know plenty of people who have been raised in an entirely non religious way, who have found their own faith and follow it. Who hard wired them. Or indeed who hard wired the atheists. (I leave agnostics out of this for obvous reasons).
Nevertheless, I still think we should respect each others opinion and not be so personal. :(
You can crawl out of it any way you want Hobbes, you apologised to Cowsy, so that's OK.Quote:
Originally posted by hobbes@19 September 2003 - 03:42
CWG: I apologize to you because we are strangers and you had no way of knowing my true intent. In addition, I have no ego problem with saying I am sorry. I guess phone sex is not technically called "prostitution". <_< (yes, that's a joke).
Actually, I consider myself more like wine than catshit, an aquired taste.
As to my "fight" with j2k4, I have a lot of respect for the man. Our arguments have been mostly good humoured. We have slung insults at each other without reverting to the vitriol you stooped to. It certainly wasn't your job to butt in with that shit. J2k4 is quite capable of looking after himself, as he has proved often enough.
@jpaul:
First off, who did I demand an apology from? Read first JP, answer after.Quote:
I love it when people, who are happy to abuse and name-call others get onto the moral high ground and demand an apology when someone is "nasty" to them.
Have I ever had a problem with that? Play me, not my friends.Quote:
I also love it when people talk about what they are and aren't as if others should know this. The only way people know you here is thro' what you write and how you write it. So if someone forms an opinion of you it is based on your own words.
I find it rather ironic that you should be defending the catholic church from a charge of brainwashing. I would have thought with all the shit and misery they have caused to so many people, and continue to cause, that an accusation like that was small fry.
I stand by my words, teaching religion, any religion, to young kids, who don't understand both sides is wrong, and an attempt to instill a doctrine before the child is old enough to make up their own mind.
The point you make about people being raised in a non religious way, then finding faith, reinforces my view, there is no need to force it on kids.
As to bashing Islam, be my guest, who cares. I personally find that it's judaism that is untouchable, not islam. I guess I'm anti-semetic, at least, I hope I am.
B)