Printable View
If the hero of the movie you watched has a massive chin with a hole in it, and Michelle Rodriguez runs around being boring, you watched Battle: LA.
If you don't remember what anyone looked like, cept the tits on the burd with the sword, it's prolly the other one.
Makes me wonder if they purposely released the shit one (battle of los angeles) at the same time as the better one (battle: los angeles) to hope that it can ride on the coat-tails of the success of the latter, by tricking people because of teh similar names.Quote:
Originally Posted by Snee
Yesh. The Battle of Los Angeles one is terrible, the other one wot I think ewe've got is slightly better. It's a bit as if they aspired to make something along the lines of Black Hawk Down but with Aliens. Degrades a bit though, laying it on a bit thick with the marines being super awesome heroes or something else. Which is a fairly common affliction with (some) merkin directors. At least it's less gay for soldiers than Transformers. And it has a mexican dude totally and a bit randomly going for an hero-ness.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mulder
Battle of Los Angeles has dodgy dialogue wot will make you wish someone had given the writer a dictionary at the very least. The effects are dodgy, the actors are bad, the plot is wank (think of the other one crossed with Independence Day), and it has some weird chick wearing lycra popping in and surprise-swording some aliens. She's all like 'sup, I'm majestic, brb, gonna gank some aliens'.
Having seen both, I'd say Battle: LA is better, but it's still not owt to write home about.
Anyone remember when Transmorphers got released around the same time that TF2 was announced?
Like it was yesterday. And by like it was yesterday i of course mean no, not at all. :smilie4:
/Had another visit from 5-0 last night, sort of. Was in bed watching a moviefilm (the way back, fucking well epic it was!) and then my window started going mental flashing. opened the curtains and it was the police in the garden trying to get my attention, asked if i was flat 1 - i said no, they said kthnxby :eyebrows:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzmpTG1CZzI
Hobo With A Shotgun 2011 HDTV Rip Xvid AC3 LKRG - fuck yes! :o
Almost certainly the case. I think Syfy has done almost the same before, can't be coincidence they did it again.Quote:
Originally Posted by tescoMakes me wonder if they purposely released the shit one (battle of los angeles) at the same time as the better one (battle: los angeles) to hope that it can ride on the coat-tails of the success of the latter, by tricking people because of teh similar names.Quote:
Originally Posted by Snee
When will they ever learn to stick to making such great fillums as Dinoshark, and Octoshark*. Although, admittedly, both of those would actually be a lot improved if they took away every single moment of dialogue and just had the shark-thingies eat everyone.
*Err, apparently it's 'Sharktopus' - a fantastic name for a fantastic movie.
Sharktopus! No wai! I'm getting it. Dinoshark was lulz.
Of course they released LA at the same time as LA to try and cash in. It happens with about 10% of big hollywood action fillums. Thing is, the only real difference most of the time is the budget, and everything that brings. In the main part, they are generic, wishy-washy, shite.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U87zVkIXNI0
...fantastic.
Genious. Maximised.