Printable View
True! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by dragos
that site is horrible in every way ,not just content. It is the most useless tracker i've ever had the bad luck of getting my hands onQuote:
Originally Posted by Mister Moo
I wonder why SCL is still level 5, side by side with ScT, PT and BitMeTV... It is a very recent tracker and signups were opens couple of months ago for gods sake. be sensible and put it in level 4.
the most reasone why is scl on lvl5 is because its much harder to get these unlike on ScT or other sites that are on same lvl5..Quote:
Originally Posted by 0Ri0NTrue! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by dragos
I wonder why SCL is still level 5, side by side with ScT, PT and BitMeTV... It is a very recent tracker and signups were opens couple of months ago for gods sake. be sensible and put it in level 4.
u can almost always see someone want to trade acc or invites for sct,also there are few GA for sct and bitmetv,but not for scl at all
lol yea they have had open signups *few months ago*(lol we could just wait couple of years then?) and if u call it very recent tracker than its not..they have been online over 4 months now and i dont call that recent( but that is not the point here)
;)
I think that scl will be the best
0ri0n are you sane ? it's almost impossible getting an invite to scl today.
I believe that, site is down so its really impossible! :naughty:Quote:
Originally Posted by fusionz
Cīmon guys, we should be reasonable, a recent tracker (a tracker to be considered mature should have more that 1 year of existence. Remember SCN and RTS?) can not be in the same position of mature trackers like ScT and BitmeTV, even if the demand and difficulty to get an invite is the same.
0ri0n
1. bitmetv is a joke don't even mention it.
2. true, scl is young but you can't judge by that. it's already online for 4 months and shows great potential.
no u are unreasonable or u dont understand some things here..Quote:
Originally Posted by 0Ri0NI believe that, site is down so its really impossible! :naughty:Quote:
Originally Posted by fusionz
Cīmon guys, we should be reasonable, a recent tracker (a tracker to be considered mature should have more that 1 year of existence. Remember SCN and RTS?) can not be in the same position of mature trackers like ScT and BitmeTV, even if the demand and difficulty to get an invite is the same.
also (lol) u could said 5 years at least to be on net before he can be on list at all:dabs:
RTS?? u really know how to compare sites:cool:
I will go with ORiON..... u have to give trackers sometime before judging them....certaily not 5 years....but within 5 months u can't put SCL and ITS in the same league as SCT and Bitmetv....Trackers ranking on rarity isn't right for me .....This rarity thing doesn't takes time considerations whether the trackers is new or old .... and ..how good they are....
This topic is classifying sites from level 1 to 10 based on their rarityQuote:
Originally Posted by Akamajor
also there is no rule or something to prevent (new) tracker to be in higher list
- 1 being the easiest to get into a site and 10 the hardest.
- This has nothing to do with contents of the trackers.
we are only playing by the (book) :)
5 months is enough time rating a tracker you can still see the demand and rarity is high. :naughty:Quote:
Originally Posted by Akamajor