u can upload on ftn 200gb lets say in 2 month or 3 or 4 but TT its 50 weeks:cry: for sure TT is harder now then beforeQuote:
Originally Posted by taba
Quote:
Originally Posted by WannaTrade
- yes
- and 200g in ftn isnt that easy
Printable View
u can upload on ftn 200gb lets say in 2 month or 3 or 4 but TT its 50 weeks:cry: for sure TT is harder now then beforeQuote:
Originally Posted by tabaQuote:
Originally Posted by WannaTrade
- yes
- and 200g in ftn isnt that easy
yeah it's harder than before
but there's no demands for TT as FTN..;)
hmmm ... Its not that powerful content there... so ... y it ranked at level 6 ?Quote:
Originally Posted by hungdob
cuz czone and Linko have gr8 content than fb :frusty:
I think the tracker rating on oink should be a 10. They have the best content IMO, and if it wasn't so damn hard to seed, I'd use for most everything.
agreed , also Kg must be at least 9 (Regarding Speciality) :)Quote:
Originally Posted by mbucari1
i would just like to say that i think oink is a bad tracker, there's lots of content, but speeds are bad, little leechers, ok maybe they have rare music, but if u don't want that then you totally don't need oink and have many other good music trackers to choose from
I don't think any general music tracker should be rated too high. If you are really into music then you will have a hard time finding lots of stuff on OiNK.
I wouldn't agree on it being a bad tracker though. Even if there is only one seed on a torrent and you get bad speeds, you can still be almost sure that the one seed will continue seeding until you get the torrent.
Because sweDVDr has closed the invitations ... I recommend that it should be at higher rate
so ?
Edit: Nevermind
it's quite early for that to happen :)Quote:
Originally Posted by himo