you think we'd be better safe than sorry?

If you insist that the sky is normally green in color, and I insist in my own turn that it is blue, we are at an impasse.

If you posit a theory that makes no sense to me whatsoever, and insist that "kinda accurate" constitutes irrefutability, then I am left to conclude you willfully refuse to be convinced otherwise.

This is not debate, it is light-years from reasonable discussion and bereft of logic, yet you insist it has merit and worth.

You have a brain, but not the least idea of what to do with it, yet think you can win or forestall arguments merely by keeping what you do not know at arm's-length.

You readily admit you know nothing of politics or history, yet you make no effort to inform yourself.

I have better things to do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

If you insist that the sky is normally green in color, and I insist in my own turn that it is blue, we are at an impasse.

If you posit a theory that makes no sense to me whatsoever, and insist that "kinda accurate" constitutes irrefutability, then I am left to conclude you willfully refuse to be convinced otherwise.

This is not debate, it is light-years from reasonable discussion and bereft of logic, yet you insist it has merit and worth.

You have a brain, but not the least idea of what to do with it, yet think you can win or forestall arguments merely by keeping what you do not know at arm's-length.

You readily admit you know nothing of politics or history, yet you make no effort to inform yourself.

I have better things to do.

---

pfft. not the point. i'm saying there's more reason for america to have committed a false flag attack than al-qaeda to have done it. you're saying i'm wrong but haven't actually said why. you just choose to believe the official story and ignore common sense.

i know not of putins past, but that doesn't stop the US having influence on russia from a stonghold in afghanistan.

i know that whether you believe in a free market or not. taking someones oil is beneficial to you.

i'm pretty sure the vast majority of people are born with the sense to dismiss their own high investment-high risk-low return ideas.


i'm making an effort to inform myself. i'm just not learning shit from you. you just think an argument should be about winning. i'm sticking to the point because i don't want you to own me something irrelevent then let this thread lie, justifying your own dismissal of this theory, based on the grounds that you don't really like the idea much.


i think you're misunderstanding the kinda accurate/irrefutability thing.

alex jones was vague in his description of 911, but accurate in that something unlike anything that had ever happened in history happened within his few months. included his hijacked planes and buildings blowing up, and was blamed on his bin laden.

that's completely seperate to what i said was irrefutable.

i said it's irrefutable that no matter how intolerant you are, investing all your money in an attack on a hugely capable enemy without any plan for the aftermath is illogical. and america have gained power from these attacks.


if i insist the sky is green and you insist the sky is blue. tell me to go outside and look.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GepperRankins

if i insist the sky is green and you insist the sky is blue. tell me to go outside and look.

---

That is precisely what I have been telling you to do, in the most comprehensive way possible.

As to your contention I haven't 'disproved' your and Jones' theory, I believe it far-fetched to the point of not standing on it's own to begin with.

I say, 'support your own supposition'; you say, "here is one I've found on the interweb that is counter to commonly-accepted wisdom-see if you can refute it".

One cannot prove a negative.

With that I am finished, here.

Really.

Did osama want to attack the cleaners in world trade center on 911 day lol. What did he aimed in pentagon and why there were no parts of airplane found ?
Why there are always countries with oil to blame for terrorism and how can they save the people if they kill few thousands of poor ppl ?

I'm a little confused how Russia came into this thread. :blink:

:shuriken:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MagicNakor

I'm a little confused how Russia came into this thread. :blink:

:shuriken:

---

What ??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by limesqueezer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MagicNakor

I'm a little confused how Russia came into this thread. :blink:

:shuriken:

---

What ??

---

He said :-

I'm a little confused how Russia came into this thread.

Russia isn't to blame for USA mistakes in time

Rules:
Please remember that this area is for SERIOUS discussion and debate.

This is not an excuse to say one off offensive remarks... If you have a point to make, then make it with evidence.

One off remarks such as "I hate Muslims" and anything else construed as being beyond the rules of civilised behaviour will be dealt with. This is not to stifle debate... if you have a controversial comment to make, then by all means make it... BUT BACK IT UP.