Indeed. In fact Tyson would of been looked on more kindly -
by history, if he would of faced stiffer competition.
Man, those Hagler Hearns fights were awesome.
-bd
Printable View
I never rated Ali as "The Greatest".
He was the best heavyweight of his time, I'll agree with that but not the best boxer ever.
For me that was Leonard.
As a "pure" boxer I'll agree. I respect Ali for his political stance, at the height of his
boxing prowless. It took balls to be a black man in the 60's to stand up; like he did.
-bd
Agreed, Ali was a much more important historical figure then Leonard was, by miles.
Particularly given the treatment of and attitudes towards black Americans at that time.
He changed the World more than Ray Leonard ever did or indeed could and it is a reasonable argument to suggest that Leonard could not have achieved what he achieved without Ali breaking the ground he did.
However from a purely boxing point of view, in my opinion, Leonard was the greatest.
And cute as a button.
Haglar only fought Hearns once.:dabs:
Tyson would be looked on more kindly by history if he didn't falter so badly at the end. He demolished some pretty good boxers.
He was just much better than them. You should see his older fights. He was fucking brilliant.