Brandon,yeah,I completely agree with you,why people spend so many time comparing these two great sites-they are both good!
Printable View
Brandon,yeah,I completely agree with you,why people spend so many time comparing these two great sites-they are both good!
Heres a simple test i ran, personally i dont think page speeds matter as long as it doesnt take 10-20 secs to load. Both trackers still have excellent tracker speeds so...
AVERAGES
SCT:
Homepage: 0.4686s (0.470,0.422,0.514)
Browse 1: 1.5400s (1.000,1.650,1.970)
Browse 2: 1.2786s (1.146,1.690,1.000)
Forums : 0.5473s (0.662,0.490,0.490)
Staff : 0.6686s (0.840,0.610,0.556)
FTN: Homepage: 2.7743s (3.340,2.574,2.409)
Browse 1: 2.5440s (2.125,3.203,2.304)
Browse 2: 2.3690s (2.243,2.573,2.291)
Forums : 1.7976s (2.790,1.346,1.257)
Staff : 2.4680s (4.830,1.274,1.300)
i agreeQuote:
Originally Posted by Polarbear
don't mention it :angry: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Brandon
Brandon : go and scrape your linux and get a leopard
:D:lol:
FSC is a great place to chill, but i don'ty use it for 0day. I like site's that i visit 50 times a day for 0day to load fast. Well i was exagerating ,it's not really that slow. :happy:Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandonI'm curious how you can say that, and then I see you're all over FSC. You DO realize fsc is hosted in the exact same datacenter with similar specs.... right...? :hmm:Quote:
Originally Posted by dragos
crapQuote:
Originally Posted by the_boss
u changed the fromat, it was really crap
yeah is that http or https ??
for me https was significantly slower
edit: they don't punish people who invite leechers. that's nice.
both slow =/
ScT increased user database to 16k users :D
just got that message lol :DQuote:
Originally Posted by dragos