According to the rules on Avatar selection I'm a 14 year old boy :huh:.
Don't beat yourself up too much.....trowser wowers is unisex I reckon.
Printable View
I duno if it is unisex. I'll have to defer to Mulder :smilie4:
What I'm thinking is even a lazy lob on might elicit a 'wow' reaction (or at least the raising of one eyebrow) if someone looked at his trousers - rather than no reaction if he didn't. Whereas the reaction to a woman's trousers would be the same if she was sexually aroused or not.
Unless she was wearing tight tan riding britches.
Who's looking fuzzy britches. :naughty:
Squeams is comfortably in the girl category - indeed well past Mulder's /would benchmark
Edit: on second thoughts on some days a diseased skunk seems to get past Mulder's /would benckmark. :ermm:
In fact Squeamous may be actually be more grrrrllly than girly but she does have the good grace to be pretty with it. :shifty:
:unsure:
Here's my avatar and age.
Quality :happy:
Yeah, I don't usually read it these days owing to it being boring as feck since all the interesting posters forsook it - but I noticed Rat Faced posted so I read the thread to see if his outlook on life was as sleep inducing as ever.
It was a typical whine from him, as it happens, but I did follow it thro' to the end.