I don't really think you can call one better than the other. The fans of WWII games are obviously going to like CoD5 more; it's Call of Duty 4 with a WWII skin on.
Printable View
I don't really think you can call one better than the other. The fans of WWII games are obviously going to like CoD5 more; it's Call of Duty 4 with a WWII skin on.
Yeah, well.. Everyone is thinking that another World War II game is getting old, but if anyone here has read anything about it, its going to be set in the Pacific, which like... no game has done. None that i'm aware of anyway. I don't think it will be like every other game because its set in the Pacific. Meh, I think its going to be good.
I think that the history of the game could be longer, but the game cod 4 is a very good game
CoD3 was developed in 9 months compared to CoD4 that took a long 2 years to develop. CoD5 will be good.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smith
Yeah, Treyarch has had much, much more time to development this game, so I would hope it be good.
Why do they get back to WW2? I liked the "modern" in Cod4... But if gets good, then its good.
You're saying it's going to be good before you even know if they're going to make one? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by lukeeCoD3 was developed in 9 months compared to CoD4 that took a long 2 years to develop. CoD5 will be good.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smith
CoD5 is going to happen. This time treyarch has the time to make a quality game. They only fucked up CoD3 because they had a very short period of time to develop it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SkizoYou're saying it's going to be good before you even know if they're going to make one? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by lukee
Ah, so you're talking about CoD: World at War that is to be the next release.
That isn't CoD5.
Thank you :)