Re: Worst Private Trackers
1st: FULL CREDIT GOES TO S***** (who by the way has made so many good posts, u can check them out, maybe Ill post some of them here)
2nd: Apart from the short list at the end of the thread (trackers with few/few torrents) I havent set up any thing on Demonoid.
3rd: I think demonoid shouldnt be classified as a private tracker but as the best public tracker.
And again please dont go too harsh on comments
Re: Worst Private Trackers
I always thought of Demonoid as a Private Tracker, but it is rather
Public I know now. Still you need invite codes to get in - but they're
basically unlimited as I've heard...
Like Demonoid but BitMeTV e.g. is unmatched in that genre.
Re: Worst Private Trackers
you dont even need an account to download from demonoid
Re: Worst Private Trackers
I always thought of Demonoid as an Index not a tracker, none of the files (at least I believe) are hosted there.
Re: Worst Private Trackers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
deadalive1
I always thought of Demonoid as an Index not a tracker, none of the files (at least I believe) are hosted there.
Most of the files are hosted there. It was actually the second-biggest tracker in the world before it shut down the first time:
http://torrentfreak.com/5-most-popul...ackers-070924/
Re: Worst Private Trackers
yeah demonoid was my luv once... there were such awesome books there omg :S such awesome collections :S
Re: Worst Private Trackers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ali-g
3rd: I think demonoid shouldnt be classified as a private tracker but as the best public tracker.
I hate to argue on semantics, but private trackers are different from public trackers in 3 ways:
1) they regulate their torrents, requiring them to be "private," and prohibiting users from uploading them to other trackers.
2) they require a person to sign-in in order to download their hosted torrents
3) they recognize users in order to record their ratio and other statistics.
Demonoid scores a 2/3. It's private in my books.
Re: Worst Private Trackers
I always thought of Demonoid as a "semi-private" tracker. Whatever it's classed as, it's one of the best(if not the best) of it's kind.
Re: Worst Private Trackers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Acumen
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ali-g
3rd: I think demonoid shouldnt be classified as a private tracker but as the best public tracker.
I hate to argue on semantics, but private trackers are different from public trackers in 3 ways:
1) they regulate their torrents, requiring them to be "private," and prohibiting users from uploading them to other trackers.
2) they require a person to sign-in in order to download their hosted torrents
3) they recognize users in order to record their ratio and other statistics.
Demonoid scores a 2/3. It's private in my books.
1.they have minimum regulation on their torrents.
2. you don't have to sign-in to dl torrents (with some limitation)
3. the ratio is all screwed up.
but i still think Demoniod is the best
Re: Worst Private Trackers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Acumen
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ali-g
3rd: I think demonoid shouldnt be classified as a private tracker but as the best public tracker.
I hate to argue on semantics, but private trackers are different from public trackers in 3 ways:
1) they regulate their torrents, requiring them to be "private," and prohibiting users from uploading them to other trackers.
2) they require a person to sign-in in order to download their hosted torrents
3) they recognize users in order to record their ratio and other statistics.
Demonoid scores a 2/3. It's private in my books.
Which 2?
I havent really used the old D in a while (at least on a regular basis), but I think I remember finding their torrents on mininova (#1) And downloading from there before i was a member (#2)
Also, although they keep track of your d/l and u/l (kind of) they dont ban you for bad ratio.