Tracker curiosity

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by murder

For me it would have to be Pedros btmusic, I mean come on you get a warning if you seed to much.

---

It sucks that you see it that way. Because to me P's is one of the best trackers because of this overseeding rule.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Funkin'

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by murder

For me it would have to be Pedros btmusic, I mean come on you get a warning if you seed to much.

---

It sucks that you see it that way. Because to me P's is one of the best trackers because of this overseeding rule.

---

yeah, in some aspects this "non overseeding" system sucks less than other systems.. which doesn't stop it from sucking ;) imo, ratio system just can't be considered any good while it limits seeding.. yes, it works.. but i really think there could be better alternatives, i already posted some of my thoughts at their forum, but guys there are really into current system and just can't put enough efforts to try to look at it from the side to see its disadvantages and to figure out the more optimal variant..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stoi

give me a tracker that can virtually max a 20meg connection, or even just respectible download @ 20KBs on a 2-3 yr old torrent, and that is what i want.

---

Karagarga satisfy this criteria. there's almost always one seeder at least, even on very old torrents and if it's not the case, reseed requests are filled pretty quickly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stoi

Well its true for me anyway, artemis and a few more if they see this me go off it with me, but the fact is what the fuck are we here for, to share files and to get them as quick as possible.

now that does not mean that pre times have to be as quick as possible 10seconds after pre. but 90% of the torrents on the tracker have to go at least 20KBs more if you are lucky.

this is what really pisses me off with tracker speed, it is all relied on pre time, where is the i downloaded a 2 year old torrent, and i got 500KBs + on the fucking thing, that to me is more important than getting a pre-time of 10 seconds ans a 100meg dl, 0 sec trackers can so that, good on them, whoopie doo. but i dont give a shit.

give me a tracker that like i said can do a 2 year old torrent at my max speed and i am there, a tracker with 10 second pre i can get off usenet and not seed back a byte.

Sorry but 0 day trackers are pointless, trackers with 7,000 torrents where most of the 3,000 members are uploading at 1KBs are pointless, give me a tracker that can virtually max a 20meg connection, or even just respectible download @ 20KBs on a 2-3 yr old torrent, and that is what i want.

but not these that have 7,000 torrents, with 3000 memebers and all they can give me is 1KBs dowanload on a DVD ffs, sorry but emule here i come.

---

That's OK, I never pick on the ratarsed, I'm going to wait until you wake up with your hang over............:naughty:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kukushka

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Funkin'

It sucks that you see it that way. Because to me P's is one of the best trackers because of this overseeding rule.

---

yeah, in some aspects this "non overseeding" system sucks less than other systems.. which doesn't stop it from sucking ;) imo, ratio system just can't be considered any good while it limits seeding.. yes, it works.. but i really think there could be better alternatives, i already posted some of my thoughts at their forum, but guys there are really into current system and just can't put enough efforts to try to look at it from the side to see its disadvantages and to figure out the more optimal variant..

---

However, anyone can at least seed 1:1 each torrent, no matter which kind of shit connection he/she has. Keep a good ratio is not problem at all there, but the same thing doesn't take place on Waffles / What due to the users overseeding w/o rest w/ super seedboxes.

Of course frequent freeleechs helps a lot, which also does not exist in what/waffles. Finally, I never had problems with ratio in Pedro's, not for more or for less, and I always jump at any torrent I want w/o worry.

IMHO better than this rule only if there is no ratio system ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlackBird_

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kukushka

yeah, in some aspects this "non overseeding" system sucks less than other systems.. which doesn't stop it from sucking ;) imo, ratio system just can't be considered any good while it limits seeding.. yes, it works.. but i really think there could be better alternatives, i already posted some of my thoughts at their forum, but guys there are really into current system and just can't put enough efforts to try to look at it from the side to see its disadvantages and to figure out the more optimal variant..

---

However, anyone can at least seed 1:1 each torrent, no matter which kind of shit connection he/she has. Keep a good ratio is not problem at all there, but the same thing doesn't take place on Waffles / What due to the users overseeding w/o rest w/ super seedboxes.

IMHO better than this rule only if there is no ratio system ;)

---

the best system is the one that stimulate people to seed, to give speed to tracker, to donate, to upload with proportions that could lead to maximum tracker developement while similarly rewarding its contributing members..

...looking at the torrent numbers, pedro's doesn't develop currently.

simple no ratio system doesn't stimulate users anyhow

...there's no way to blame high speed users for bringing speeds to tracker, only current ratio systems are to blame if it hurts other users or these high speeds are denied
BUT! if someone can't upload, can't seed, can't donate - just can't give nothing to the tracker, i can't accept no complaints from such users for some reason ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlackBird_

IMHO better than this rule only if there is no ratio system ;)

---

no ratio = no seeders
as simple as that.

pedros is pretty strick , but something is doing well, torrents dont die and everyones is able to get a good ratio easely.

just addapt to their system and stop bicthing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheFoX

The trouble is, collecting trackers is like snorting coke. Your more you collect (or snort), the more you need to fulfil your habit.

I should also point out that a community requires participation. You cannot join a place and expect instant acceptance. You have to work at acceptance, and if you put in the effort, the reward is a place that means so much more to you.

So, keep snorting the cocaine, because the highs will only last a short time, while those who actually want something to be a part of something, will gain a much longer term of happiness.

---

:lol:

IPT is the only one i have found that was better than i expected,and still find it the best