Printable View
wow........just change the word "Gay" for the baddie of the day....and you have brought the subject round to American Foreign Policy....Quote:
Originally posted by Billy_Dean@19 September 2003 - 19:22
It's a well known fact that children brought up by gay parents always turn out gay.
They are also more likely to become junkies and rob old people.
Most long term prisoners are gay too, which proves most gays are criminals.
That's what I heard anyway.
:)
j/k
Amen to that
In the UK the Labour government legalised homosexuality in the 60's with a legal age of 21. They(Labour) reduced that age to 18 in the 80's or 90's. Now they(Labour) are reducing it to 16. Will it be compulsory under the next labour government?
They have equalised the age of consent.
If you were 15, 16 or 17...or had a bf/gf that age, i bet you'd complain if they equalised it the other way..
ie: Age of consent = 18. (or worse, 21)
Now if they made Age of Consent for homosexuals 15, and kept hetros at 16...you'd have a point.
If they make sex compulsary at 16.....then im really upset to have missed out on that by 22 years.
And i know a lot of young males and females that would love it....Im sure they think that already ;)
resolved
I can only assume that this is a sample of hybrid Brit/Aussie humor.Quote:
Originally posted by Billy_Dean@19 September 2003 - 12:22
It's a well known fact that children brought up by gay parents always turn out gay.
They are also more likely to become junkies and rob old people.
Most long term prisoners are gay too, which proves most gays are criminals.
That's what I heard anyway.
:)
Sometimes it's hard to tell with old Billy.
In a later post you mentioned something about "the facts". Where are the facts in this rant? All I see is part of some story about the shrubs and alot of generalizations.Quote:
Originally posted by lynx@19 September 2003 - 11:24
I, for one, am sick to death of hearing about these so called 'Gay Rights'.
Many of the 'rights' that are claimed are actually things which are denied to everyone, but the gays seem think they are a special case.
As an example, one of the squares in London had the foliage trimmed as part of normal 'tidying up'. The sexual activities of the gays who 'cruised' in this square could then be seen by the local residents, who complained. The gays then argued that the bushes should be allowed to grow back so they could continue their activities. The point is that these same activities between heterosexuals would still be illegal - why were the gays demanding special circumstances for themselves?
We don't see special interest groups being set up for heterosexuals, with millions in public money and grants being put aside, why should homosexuals expect special treatment. If they want to be treated the same as everyone else, they should start acting the same as everyone else, but instead the seem to want to continually bring attention to themselves. I think that in many cases (particularly in showbusiness) they are actually just trying to get themselves noticed.
How is demanding the right to have a legally recognized marriage the same as demanding special circumstances? Take religion and religious views out of the equation, because it doesn't apply to everyone, and what do you have left? Discrimination, plain and simple.
What is normal?Quote:
Originally posted by james_bond_rulez@19 September 2003 - 04:42
have you seen how gays talk in tv interviews? have you heard their sounds? their sounds tend to be higher than the average males and what does that indicate? chemical imbalance? hormone thing? something medical? i mean, it's not nornal.
amen
it looks like rain