You always admire what you really don't understand.
Printable View
You always admire what you really don't understand.
The idea is well founded though its obviously liable to abuse.But I figure you guys are adept enough to tell the legit from the phony check requests.
Aside from the aforementioned suggestions I think its also a good idea if you let the party being checked know that they are being checked.It not only gives them a chance to back out of the invite application if they are indeed going to turn out albatross but also avails an opportunity for you guys to hear a second side of a story that might as well not add up to the first one.All in all it serves to ease your job.
As for long term sustainability,I like to be the optimistic type but I think with this one its gonna reach a point where it'll be too much work combined with a host of other wearisome factors that will eventually lead you guys into ditching the idea or adjust it to be material for a select few sites.
I appreciate the idea, though I don't believe it would give some shocking results, besides .. giveaways on FST are pathetic or I am not the giveaway dude.
Well I suppose, it could be a start :D
idk, maybe i'm the only one who did this, but for me it feels much more comfortable to ask profile links with verifying that they're actually belong to the guy who asks on common trackers, so if something will go wrong, i could report the guy to staff at the trackers he mentioned. maybe it would make sense to implement system to check on guys even if giveway holder don't have no tracker that the possible inviter belongs to.
but the thing is i have some hesitations that the battle for activity in this section is a bit lost and reform won't revive it... won't like to see cabalo's efforts wasted in vain so gl
Here goes a bump.
why not simply make a guide about cautions to take before giving an invite ?
all this new refuges atmosphere makes things worse