Quote:
Originally posted by TenebraruM@23 October 2003 - 09:58
Doesn't it just sooo agravate you the way no0bs critisize you and make fun of you, saying that you're wrong all the time and that you're stupid to buy a PC ' instead' of a console and that consoles are just 'so' much better than PCs?
Damn they must be idiots if they think that PCs are only for gaming ...
I mean there was something on the teletext Digitiser replacement letters section recently, it went something like this:
(Note that me is NOT me)
Me: Why do you buy a PC instead of a console, when the console has just as good games, has more of the latest games, is cheap and easy to use?
Friend: Urm ... because it costs 10x as much, and you have to download all the patches and updates before you can play?
OMFG the ignorance!!
1) Consoles suck compared with PCs
I mean even the revolutionary PS2 128 bit emotion engine graphics is surpassed these days by the ATi 9800XT and the nVidia FX5900U ...
When I was saying this to a friend that had an Xbox, I said to him it was based on a 733mHz P3 (what I didn't realise at the time was that it was based on the rubbish Celeron), and that modern PCs were 2.53 at least with 6 operations per cycle ...
He replied that the Xbox was more than that, about 4gHz or he thought even more
I mean FFS! he thought that HD space was internal volatile memory!! what a ignorant no0b
Later he got a Celeron from Dell and said that his PC owned and it was the latest!! put up the benchmarks and guess what ... I had a 3DMark 4x his, I mean ffs he thought that prebuilts owned ... omg
And also there was something on Digitiser recently 'God I feel like a Geek, comparing mHz with gHz, deciding which is better, really got to know what your talking about'
Rrrrrr
And I mean
RRRRRRRRRR
This makes me feel ******* angry, I hate ignorance!!
And especially told I'm wrong by a ******* no0b!!
They know **** all and should listen to us
I still havn't vented my anger RRRRRRr
It was surpassed by alot of the graphics processors of its time too.