Re: New Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnnY
Yeah, but "coupling" was using the same scripts a lot of the time, the only thing different was the actors.
I don't get why they had to make the American version, the american actors weren't even better looking than the britons.
So it has to be a problem with the accents or the lighting or something that made them make a new version. :blink:
The accents.
As I said, many Americans view the British accent as snobby, prim, and proper. I think I liked Snatch because it wasn't any of those things...just "down and dirty British".
Unless it's Star Wars or Lock, Stock, Mean Machine, or Snatch type British...we don't want it....and even then it's hard to be a hit. ;)
Re: New Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
The accents.
As I said, many Americans view the British accent as snobby, prim, and proper. I think I liked Snatch because it wasn't any of those things...just "down and dirty British".
Unless it's Star Wars or Lock, Stock, Mean Machine, or Snatch type British...we don't want it....and even then it's hard to be a hit. ;)
those are films not tv shows, although some were made into tv shows.
one thing occured to me..... it may have something to do with union membership. I know that it's hard to keep the same cast of a succesful west end play if it starts running on broadway
Re: New Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
those are films not tv shows, although some were made into tv shows.
Thayat mane's a janeyus!!! :lol: :lol:
