Re: your home is not your castle
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420
Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
sorry to go off-topic but frankly i find that quite offensive.
it's a rediculous stereotype to call single parent families lumpen. it may be ostensible as we're poor but we certainly aren't lumpen.
I think manker was a tad orotund with his post but I'm sure he didn't mean offense.
On-topic: I'm with Busyman here, if anyone "bought" my property out then I'd be waiting for them Stephen King's
Roadwork style.
That of course would be my last resort.
Maybe after I am martyred it would attract enough attention to the issue. :ph34r:
I would have to be paid dearly. My home is not just money. It has sentimental value and they'll have to overpay to uproot me.
Else they can go fuck themselves.
I can imagine some fuckhead in government salivating over the tax revenue of letting a builder throw up 24 houses on 8 acres of land and claiming Eminent Domain to do it.
I'll shoot the first motherfucker in a Caterpillar. :angry:
Re: your home is not your castle
Re: your home is not your castle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guillaume
Obviously. That's why it went to the Supreme Court.
Here
and more here
I am not kidding either. If some knucklehead politician deems my land would be offer as part of development for million-dollar homes, someone is getting shot. I firmly believe this would be a case of "unjust government" removing me from my home against my will, whether I'm paid or not.
I happen to live next to woods (left side and back) and across the street is woods as well. I have one neighbor. My area is farms, farms, farms and already their is a hearing coming due to one of the strawberry farms selling to a home developer (more suburban sprawl).
All of this because someone has bigger pockets and influence than me.
All of this to make someone's pockets bigger at the cost of my liberties.
They best leave me the fuck alone before I develop a Napoleon complex.
Re: your home is not your castle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
I am not kidding either. If some knucklehead politician deems my land would be offer as part of development for million-dollar homes, someone is getting shot. I firmly believe this would be a case of "unjust government" removing me from my home against my will, whether I'm paid or not.
Vigilantism and guns, a kewl combination.
I see the pathos in your situation and have sympathy for you. However shooting people may not be the best solution.
People's lives > Ideal homes.
Re: your home is not your castle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
They best leave me the fuck alone before I develop a Napoleon complex.
There was me thinking your hand was in there for another reason.:)
Re: your home is not your castle
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
I am not kidding either. If some knucklehead politician deems my land would be offer as part of development for million-dollar homes, someone is getting shot. I firmly believe this would be a case of "unjust government" removing me from my home against my will, whether I'm paid or not.
Vigilantism and guns, a kewl combination.
I see the pathos in your situation and have sympathy for you. However shooting people may not be the ideal solution.
People's lives > Ideal homes.
Worst case scenario.
I amount what the government, excuse me, the corporation is doing to stealing my home.
I won't allow that without making a point.
Btw, it doesn't have to be guns. It could be a knife or baseball bat.
Either way, I view it as unjustgovernmentmenship.
I rather it not get to the point of them actually coming to remove me from my home or else there will definitely be trouble.
They should have to satisfy the homeowners with more than market value.
The windfall they expect with the sales shouldn't make it hard to put them out of their way. Don't get it wrong. If they came to me with a great offer, I'd jump on it. "Market value", however, is bullshit. There are homes that getting bidded on that go much higher than market value. I was lucky enough to overbid by only $1000. I previously was outbidded for a home by $30,000 and another by $56,000.
I see potential corruption as it would be easy to assault the poor and middle-class 'cause those homes and land would be cheaper.
Btw, if the people's lives were so important, why would they risk it on an act that is so unjust. They must put less value on life themselves.
I am not content in being walked all over and if a bullet brings attention to it, so be it but I'd rather do a petition.
Re: your home is not your castle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Vigilantism and guns, a kewl combination.
I see the pathos in your situation and have sympathy for you. However shooting people may not be the ideal solution.
People's lives > Ideal homes.
I won't allow that without making a point.
Btw, it doesn't have to be guns. It could be a knife or baseball bat.
Either way, I view it as unjustgovernmentmenship.
I fully accept that I am no expert, but can someone actually be shot using a knife or baseball bat.
Re: your home is not your castle
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
I won't allow that without making a point.
Btw, it doesn't have to be guns. It could be a knife or baseball bat.
Either way, I view it as unjustgovernmentmenship.
I fully accept that I am no expert, but can someone actually be shot using a knife or baseball bat.
Of course.
Come to my house in a threatening manner with either and you will be shot.
JPaulism back at you. :ph34r:
Re: your home is not your castle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
I fully accept that I am no expert, but can someone actually be shot using a knife or baseball bat.
Of course.
Come to my house in a threatening manner with either and you will be shot.
JPaulism back at you. :ph34r:
:lol: good lad.
Re: your home is not your castle
I wonder if these constuctionist judges the conservatives are wanting would judge that Busy has a 2nd amendment case here?
Probably not
