2nd amendment V private comapny

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GepperRankins

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

What if they banned the word "The", would you not use it.

Human rights be damned, the employer's word is law.

No wait, shit loads of people went thro' serious hard times to stop that kind of servile thinking. At least they did where I come from.

http://www.sfu.ca/~rptoews/hardie.jpg

---

http://image.basspro.com/images/images2/82000/82242.jpg


you gotta be

---

A pathetic use of the rod to attempt a rod.

V Poor.

Quote:

---

What if a company banned red socks, would that be OK.

---

yes.

a companys rules are rules. they don't even need a reason. unless it's a personal thing. like banning the name David, it's fair

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GepperRankins

Quote:

---

What if a company banned red socks, would that be OK.

---

yes. wrong

a companys rules are rules. wrong they don't even need a reason.wrong unless it's a personal thing. like banning the name David, it's fair wrong

---

Today's winner in the being wrong competition.

We gave that type of thinkng up decades ago. Why were you not informed.

STFU n00b :lol:


i'm leaving :dry:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Over here, that's why unions exist.

Our unions wouldn't get far if they shitfit over things carrying a gun and companies wouldn't if they harped on the word "the".

---

To be fair, I have no idea what that means.

I suspect you have the same sensation re the concept of abstraction.

What if a company banned red socks, would that be OK.

---

It means the negotiations between the union and the company would go to shit.

Regarding socks, yes if there is a dress code that prohibits it. Personally it would suck.....to wear red socks. Again everything comes down to what's negotiated and agreed upon.

Red underwear would have been a better example since it is pretty much sight unseen JP. :dry:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Regarding socks, yes if there is a dress code that prohibits it.

---

What if it's a black face.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Regarding socks, yes if there is a dress code that prohibits it.

---

What if it's a black face.

---

that's racist and the victim can't do anything about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Regarding socks, yes if there is a dress code that prohibits it.

---

What if it's a black face.

---

A black face is not an article of clothing unless it's a mask.

Just don't wear the mask to work.

Otherwise it's against the law......and one should bleach their face white or any other color.
Tbh, most folk don't have black faces. I have a caramel complexion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GepperRankins

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

What if it's a black face.

---

that's racist and the victim can't do anything about it.

---

So you can't abstract either, OK. (Which specific race is black of face, btw and why is it racist to mention the colour of their face.)

Let's keep it simple then. If we have to work on a basic level.

What legal right does a company in the USA have to forbid it's employees to bear arms.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

What if it's a black face.

---

A black face is not an article of clothing unless it's a mask.

Just don't wear the mask to work.

Otherwise it's against the law......and one's bleach their face white or any other color.
Tbh, most folk don't have black faces. I have a caramel complexion.

---

Just don't wear the red socks, let your boss tell you what do, even if it has nowt to do with doing your job.

Like having a gun in your car.