I have used both for sometime (along with a couple others) and have settled on utorrent. Its just more efficient and lightweight for me.
Printable View
I have used both for sometime (along with a couple others) and have settled on utorrent. Its just more efficient and lightweight for me.
I currently use Azurues but I am considering uTorrent. I switched from Limewire to Bearshare today so I am open for a change lol
utorrent is the best it can be work on the 1980 s pc also.
u torrent less resource consumption
but i prefer Azures have cool plug-ins
-------
if you use it in unix or linux it will consume less resource
we all know windows--hhhh
uTorrent - less resources and it's just as good (or better) at what bitcomet and azureus were designed to do, and that is downloading and seeding.
Utorrent, definetely
Just like asking Norton vs Nod32
1 is a memory hog which uses up all resources resulting in slow pc and a pig to get off your HD.
The other is a quick,effective scanner light on resources and very user friendly.
Azureus has a nice interface, but it does waste resources.
utorrent runs smoother, I prefer using less resources and give up some of the trendy looks
I prefer Utorrent rather than Azureus but I think BitComet pwn both X_x
bitcomet apparently has alot of issues , and is banned on most 1st class trackers so... :)
I love uTorrent much better Azureus.
i love utorrent
simply: the best
utorrent ftw!
utorrent killed 2 of my hardrives since it uses the hardrive as cache instead of the memory. hardrives aren't meant for that much stress, unless we're talking enterprise level scsi hardrives
I love uTorrent, it fast, simple, small and awesome!
azureus for me i have been looking at utorrent and thinking about it
I'm a simple guy and I really like utorrent. Azureus is seemed very complicated, but utorrent is very simple and easy to use.
just started using az, it seems pretty easy.
I've almost always used Azureus. I've switched and always come back. I like the GUI.
now wild-bytes has said it will ban all users who use Azureus?! wtf? It's the only site i've seen that forbids the use of EVERY version of Azureus. I guess utorrent is it if you're a wid-bytes user.
utorrent very good.
I switched to utorrent, no regrets.
I also switched from Azureus to uTorrent, and I'm never going back!
utorrent is working really good 4 me:D
i prefer azureus over utorrent but i use both interchangeably
utorrent seems better, i am going to give it a shot.
once i downloaded final destination 3 and i saw that the same film, the same torrent was uploaded to more than 4 private trackers. i tried to seed them in all that trackers, but there was a difference in the .nfo files.
i tried to seed them with utorrent, i failed, but azureus can select the downloaded file's location for every file in the torrent seperately.
if you have a powerful pc, and interested in the configurations, you should use azureus.
if you like tiny but really good client u should use utorrent.
hope it was helpful.
by the way, have anyone seen the torrents in getazureus.com site? there is a sample content section over there.
i have downloaded with 22 kB/s with only 2 seeders :D
i wish i could find every torrent i'm looking for in that section but no chance :D
utorrent is fine
I was a pure azureus user... switched to utorrent and am glad i did.
Same as above.. I love utorrent now that I made the switch.
utorrent is easy
In my opinion uTorrent is better, faster and smaller in size :)
I really like Azureus, but I've never used uTorrent so can't compare it. Im an advocate of Java though so I couldn't possible say a bad word against az :/
utorrent is slower than azureus but dont need java :)
Slower how?:huh: Download speed? :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by Iuz
I find azureus a huge drain on resources compared to uTorrent, my only gripe about uTorrent is that it's not cross platform.. I would love a Linux or OSX port.
uTorrent is the better application.
just downloaded utorrent myself, liking it so far