Is Trading BAD?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sear

@BrianH, well you logged on to read that thread and that wasn't to long ago. If you really would like to be disabled that's fine feel free to PM me on fsc and I'll disable you no hard feelings. As for Albo well you guys can say what you want but why don't you let him deal with it? You think we're unreasonable tbh all this isn't helping him. This has nothing to do with any of you, and yes you're entitled to voice your opinion I have no problem with that but if you actually care about what happens to him then this isn't the right way of handling it.

---

I like this :cool:

To y'all throwing judgement on albo coz of what he posts,you need to reassess your sense of humour.The guy is almost always riding on threads(pretty evidently) and taking his trolls as word leaves alot to be desired on your part.

almost havent seen albo post here but he seems ok person. cant see why all the hatred some members devote to him and more so to cabalo, which is clearly one of the most intelligent and quality members at FST. with him is simple: if you're a asshole, he's gonna get ya! greetz to cabalo! this forum is no fun without your sarcastic remarks and finger pointing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BrianH

albo even registered under his fst name who the hell does that

---

Me.
I was disabled at cossanostra too because of public accusations brought to you by cabalo and his right hand albo. I ve stopped trying to find a reason for what they've done. I used to really admire cabalo as for albo...hes just a kid that will never learn what it takes to be a real BTer.
Many good users are only banned on CN what proves the imaturity of their staff, therefore we shouldn't be to harsh with cabalo's ban. About albo's global ban, he probably got what he deserved .
My advice: be careful with them two doubleface mugs

what a soap.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ovisan

I aint got time to read all the thread but I can tell you one thing: there's not even one tracker that's irreplaceable in the BT world. My advice: if you don't like the staff just move on, there's loads of trackers with loads of goodies.
The difference between a good staffer and I bad one it's the experience. That is why I think that the tracker age and the staff experience should be the main criteria before joining a new tracker, and not its rarity. There are many kids with seedboxes, many TB and rare stuff uploaded who get into the staff list and the don't know exactly what they're supose to do. I recently been warned on a tracker(I respect most of the mods and users there so I wont say its name) I have never been warned in 2 years since ve been with them, by a geezer that's only been there(staff) for less than a week and I bet the only criteria for him to become a mod was tat he uploaded something like 50 TB of stuff. His English skills were awfull, I still don't know why I ve been warned for 2 weeks and after I PM him asking why he was like he will ban me if I dont accept the warn and winge any longer. I ve put all that on his lack of experience. I can't lower to his lever anyway. Another story some of you know already is that I was banned on one of my favourite trackers because my name here is the same as one on other forum and that tossa was a scammer. The funnt thing is that he was trying to ban me everywhere but none believed him cause of lack of proofs. No experienced mod will ban anyone with no resons. Yeh you know who you are casa!

Laters lads

---

Apparently you didn't :mellow:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ovisan

Many good users are only banned on CN

---

Liar :happy:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by I'm Hot

Apparently you didn't :mellow:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ovisan

Many good users are only banned on CN

---

Liar :happy:

---

You should review, the definition off good user.:ermm:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Regarding the announcing of personal information...

I have respect for those who keep one name across all (or even most) of their sites. However, there are personal reasons why some would prefer to have a second name. Even without reason, this kind of privacy should be a member's right here on FST. I believe it is distasteful (and perhaps punishable) to give out confidential information.

I regard this in the same light for individuals as I do for confidential info about trackers and their staff. I hope that the above posts (and hopefully similar future ones) will be edited (and perhaps the poster(s) be reprimanded).

---

got me another infraction good work snitch

This thread was supposed to be talking about trading idk why it turns to CN.

@cabalo : keeping denying that you didn't take that review won't help you at all, if you admitted it from the beginning you might got another chance.

@Albo : You fought cabalo's battle and you lost, so accept that. keeping speaking shit about us won't help you at all and will never harm us at anyway. so save your efforts.

@everyone : Stop questioning about our review detection because you will never know anything about it and don't think it is a joke because it is not.

I question your review detection because I have access to the facts .



And because I'm a reasonable person who believes that nothing is infallible.



Like I could look at the other accounts showing up with the same IP and just assume that you are using those to phish for traders but instead I going to check all the possibilities before jumping to conclusions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BrianH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Regarding the announcing of personal information...

I have respect for those who keep one name across all (or even most) of their sites. However, there are personal reasons why some would prefer to have a second name. Even without reason, this kind of privacy should be a member's right here on FST. I believe it is distasteful (and perhaps punishable) to give out confidential information.

I regard this in the same light for individuals as I do for confidential info about trackers and their staff. I hope that the above posts (and hopefully similar future ones) will be edited (and perhaps the poster(s) be reprimanded).

---

got me another infraction good work snitch

---

You think he needed to snitch, or maybe people who staff sites can read and see what is going on any way :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BrianH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Regarding the announcing of personal information...

I have respect for those who keep one name across all (or even most) of their sites. However, there are personal reasons why some would prefer to have a second name. Even without reason, this kind of privacy should be a member's right here on FST. I believe it is distasteful (and perhaps punishable) to give out confidential information.

I regard this in the same light for individuals as I do for confidential info about trackers and their staff. I hope that the above posts (and hopefully similar future ones) will be edited (and perhaps the poster(s) be reprimanded).

---

got me another infraction good work snitch

---

To be grammatically accurate, that would be, "You got me an infraction, snitch."

However, to be accurate, you should say, "Wow, I was an immature, loudmouth, dumbass who got myself another infraction. I had better read the rules and quit being a stupid prick before I get disabled!"

And, thanks, Duck. :)

Actually someone else went as far as to request he be disabled but I said I don't disable for stupidity someone have to put in the effort to do that himself.

no i guessed some kids username on fsc and that nerd noobz0r even said it wasnt a secret so i dont see the big deal why did u have to snitch and cry about it and get a mod to edit all the posts and give me an infraction

it always happens like this kids like u cry and staff hands them a tissue and makes everything better

and btw i posted intr4ns1t's trader name and that post was deleted and intr4ns1t edited his response with a smiley face rofl funniest shit iv seen in a long time

edit - ppl cant stand the truth

If I had to guess, I would say he has the will and the means. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdolEyes787

Actually someone else went as far as to request he be disabled but I said I don't disable for stupidity someone have to put in the effort to do that himself.

---

This thread should be talking about trading. I don't know why it turns to talking about CN instead.

@cabalo : keeping denying that you didn't take that review won't help you, if you admitted it from the beginning then you might got another chance.

@Albo : You fought for cabalo's battle and you lost. so keeping talking shit about us won't help you and won't harm us.

@everyone : stop questioning our review detection because you will never know about it, and don't think it is fake because it is not. It is like 1+1=2 it can't be any other result.

ah fuk it.. im arguing with a brainwashed 13 year old probably. cn has a funny way of popping up everywhere now and days, even though the threads arent about them. You guys must have done something extremly wrong for this to happen, am I wrong.

Either way get lost, or say something different for a change.. Thats all we hear from you CN guys now and days.. Cabalo did it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BrianH

and btw i posted intr4ns1t's trader name and that post was deleted and intr4ns1t edited his response with a smiley face rofl funniest shit iv seen in a long time

edit - ppl cant stand the truth

---

Again, I've never been a trader. romeyroam(not roameyroam) was the first nick I used on the internet, and is not my nick at TR. LonelyVagabond is my nick there, and you'll find if you review my post history there, that I have never started nor participated in a trade thread there. Do some actual research before posting absurd accusations about people you don't know.

Idoleyes do you still have that message that I sent you where one of the CN mods claimed that they had proof that it was cabalo because they could see his userID in the form of pixels??

What about the other message I sent you where MelvinMew told me that he had acess to the Fst database and thats how he knew that it was Cabalo becaus he saw his IP

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by A3M

This thread should be talking about trading. I don't know why it turns to talking about CN instead.

@cabalo : keeping denying that you didn't take that review won't help you, if you admitted it from the beginning then you might got another chance.

@Albo : You fought for cabalo's battle and you lost. so keeping talking shit about us won't help you and won't harm us.

@everyone : stop questioning our review detection because you will never know about it, and don't think it is fake because it is not. It is like 1+1=2 it can't be any other result.

---

@ a3m: you acted like assholes all the time, with stupid threads here at fst insulting me, written by 14 year's old kids and so on, i don't want another chance at CN. why would i even bother? i don't give a fuck about your site anyway. I need it as much as a bald man needs a comb. so keep playing cowboys and indians with each other. :wave:
and who told you you're anyone important to "ask" for another chance? sorry, i had to lol at that. don't be sad. :console:

Intr4ni1t, dont argue with them. I can't believe that it's been so many years and still a person's honesty is measured by their trading status

Tell him that you traded. who gives a fuk. give him the satisfaction

Brian, you should show who you are and have a balanced argument. Whatever happens you dont have to worrya bout any of your accounts being disabled

Why would the owner of a highly respected (and very good, btw) BT tracker need to trade for anything? I would be willing to bet my right nut that he has access to, or personally knows ALL of the other tracker owners. Posting such an accusation makes you look REALLY stupid, BrianH.

Posting private info about another member makes you a prick. <=== notice the lack of the word "look".

Well, the thing is, as was brought up in another thread, those of us who have experience are supposed to lead by example, so my example is disclosure. I do value whatever reputation I have managed to garner to this point, and as I have a fan making every effort to make me into something I'm not, I feel it the only responsible recourse. He's working under a false assumption so it's my belief that I should enlighten him.

cn is a laughing joke some of their staff are ex traders and their site is terrible

i wish i could access the review section on fst i would post a cn review it would be fun to see who they would blame

and albo its not about trading its about ppl denying it cuz they are now tracker staff rofl

either way bro.. who gives a fuck if they deny it or not. I bet if he accepted it, everyone would badmouth and turn his back on him. One thing i realized about bt users, is that they look for the smallest excuse to turn their back on you

Im a victim of this myself

Edit: and yea, the best definition for CN is: "a hot steam of corruption" (and that's not based at all on the fact that their staffers are ex traders)

Response to your edit: I want people to know me for who I am that's why. You got msn? i wanted to talk to you about something

i dont give a fuck if ppl are traders or ex-traders

only when kids who traded in the past become tracker staff and hunt ppl

edit - albo idn why u use the same name on fst not a smart move on the internet

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BrianH

i dont give a fuck if ppl are traders or ex-traders

only when kids who traded in the past become tracker staff and hunt ppl

---

It's becoming more difficult to tell if you are starved for attention or oxygen.:unsure:

If you intend to play "Deep Throat", do it in the privacy of your own bedroom.:dry:

ok snitch

brian you got msn? i wanna talk to you about something.. i tried to pm you but i cant(i think you have to be a member for a month)

ya

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BrianH

ok snitch

---

Webster's definition of "snitch" here .

It is apparent that you are trying to use the word as a noun.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Webster (not the cute kid played by Emmanuel Lewis)

Noun 1. snitch - someone acting as an informer or decoy for the police.

---

The accurate use of the word "snitch" has to do with someone who is working with the authorities with the pretension that he/she is one of the law breakers. The informant, or "snitch" then turns on his partners in the crime and receives a lesser sentence, or is not charged by those authorities. There is also the situation where someone was initially party to the "act" and turns on his/her partners after the fact.

I certainly was not a co-conspirator in your act(s) of maliciousness.

According to your misplaced definition, anyone who witnesses a crime, or other unjust act, and then reports it, is a "snitch". Hopefully, you can see how this would be counter-productive to a civilized society.

If anything, you can call me a "concerned citizen". :01:

look it up on urban dictionary nerd

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdolEyes787

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sear

As for Albo well you guys can say what you want but why don't you let him deal with it? You think we're unreasonable tbh all this isn't helping him. This has nothing to do with any of you, and yes you're entitled to voice your opinion I have no problem with that but if you actually care about what happens to him then this isn't the right way of handling it.

---

The war in the Middle East has nothing to do with me either, nor do fox hunts in England or the fact that some people feel the need to drive Hummers but I have an opinions that I've been known to express about those things nonetheless.
You also seem to be reading things that haven't been written.No one said anything about FSC staff being unreasonable( except for BrianH and I've already called him a cawk multiple times with no apparent effect :dry:) ,it was just put forth that others might have seen the situation differently is all .

And exacting how is it not the right way of handling it? By the holding things to the light part or the something else part.
You can PM me if you feel the need to do that to elaborate .I prefer open forum but then I'm not much of a diplomat.

As evidenced by that statement.

---

Well like I said mate anyone can say whatever they want. I value that and appreciate it and it's the main redeeming factor of this forum.

However I was pointing out that if people actually cared about what decision we came to on Albo then it wasn't the right way of handling it. We were actually reconsidering and all the public criticism for better or worse makes it that much harder.

If you or anyone has a problem with something we've done well you can post about it in public and have a whinge or if you'd actually like something to be done about it then you could have come to me or another staffer in private and expressed your feelings about the decision we had made.

In fact not one person did that after we banned Aldo. The only one to stick up for him was Cabalo which doesn't surprise me.

And Idol this wasn't directed solely at you and I hope there's no hard feelings because I actually like you and think you're a cool guy, I just wish you or someone else had come to me first :shrugs:

And @ BrianH, still waiting for your PM on fsc, though tbh I didn't think you were man enough.

snitch?? you're calling him a snitch??? In the context of it all that's .... I'm wordless.....

I swear the doctor dropped you on your head when you were born.

MBM I don't think it's worth it to spend all the effort you put into posts on BrianH. It's pretty obvious he's a member of this forum who just created an alternate to troll. You're not going to change anything about him. I think this applies to sear too, just don't bother =/. The purpose of making in alternate is to hide, he won't "man up".

not man enough to be globally banned off sites i actually use lmfao

albo just email me my msn isnt working

I told you I would do it no hard feelings. There's no way I'd push for a global ban for something as trivial as this. In fact I wouldn't even disable you at fsc, if it didn't seem to be what you wanted. I'm being honest about this. I'm not some little kid that global bans someone because they insulted me. In fact I think I'd only push for a global ban if they were a hacker or an invite seller so you have nothing to worry about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rart

MBM I don't think it's worth it to spend all the effort you put into posts on BrianH.

---

I initially made posts to BrianH because he had said some things regarding a couple of people I like and respect. TBH, I have enjoyed a certain sadistic pleasure in beating up on a half-wit and a coward. Deep down, I think we all have some sort of guilty pleasure. :happy:

Thanks kallie and Rart! :)

While I believe sear this BrianH guys only solace is the fact that you do not know who he is, so he can talk shit. Unless hes different from the rest of the kid trolls he won't admit who he is.

It usually ends with staff finding him anyway and proceeding into the following:

a) Apologies followed by wrath of staff (ban, warn, or my personal favorite - epic humiliation)

b) "I don't need x site anyway!"

c) Possible sexual pleasure inquiry by member.

So man up Brian :).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BrianH

not man enough to be globally banned off sites i actually use lmfao

---

But man enough to cast aspersions on others behind the guise of self-protection? Including but not limited to posting other nicks of people you think you know something about. So, basically, you are saying that you're better than everyone else? Hell, I'm man enough to give out my other BT nicks, where's your bravado that you display so vigorously in your posts here?

If you think that I am so petty that I would even bother trying to global ban you, then you only prove my point that you don't know anything about me.

Like I said I'm not going to hunt him down, though I could, I really just can't be bothered. It would be interesting though to see if he'd man-up and live up to his words or just talk shit behind a dupe nick. I'm not really expecting anything I just think it's hard to take him seriously if he doesn't live up to his words with action.