Hoi Squeamous.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burnsy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

How did you know :unsure:

---

By reading that Mum'sNet link from earlier, after the 'reject' profile on there had been banned, a 'BobBanana' profile appeared which basically continued to troll and take the same stance as our own reject had been... it could only have been him...

Then as soon as 'reject' was placed on moderation, 'BobBanana' signs up here?

Kinda obvious if you know what you're looking for :lol:

---

You scare me.

is this one worth me bothering to read 4 pages?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

is this one worth me bothering to read 4 pages?

---

Yes. It was Normandy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

You scare me.

---

Why? Wasn't it you who posted the link to the Mum'sNet forum? I read the same stuff you did... :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Just been to look at the IPs. I can categorically state that chavis wasn't Thorn.
They both posted at the same time and had different IPs.

I can do screenshots to prove it but I'd rather not because of my own rather twisted concept of occam's razor.

---

got up to here so far
i doubt manker's ability to work out how to look at IPs when he couldn't even fix a single feckin chavatar earlier:no:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burnsy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

You scare me.

---

Why? Wasn't it you who posted the link to the Mum'sNet forum? I read the same stuff you did... :lol:

---

Not with such beady-eyed efficiency. You're a steely-cold internets dark stallion with bloodhound pumping through its veins.

I'd like to take the time right now to say to Dave that there's no hard feelings on my part. Except for the stuff you said about MBM's kid, which is unforgivable.

And nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Something Else

The season Keegan lost it, and was arrested for fucking a coffee machine. :unsure:

---

:lol: :earl:

---

racists:emo:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

i doubt manker's ability to work out how to look at IPs when he couldn't even fix a single feckin chavatar earlier:no:

---

Bottom corner of every single post. Not difficult to figure out. There's even an accessibility feature. :shifty:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

:lol: :earl:

---

:lol:

---

and you, bawlbag:snooty:

dave should just use ctrl+v to save on his typing for each post

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

I'd like to take the time right now to say to Dave that there's no hard feelings on my part. Except for the stuff you said about MBM's kid, which is unforgivable.

And nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah.

---

Seconded :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Just been to look at the IPs. I can categorically state that chavis wasn't Thorn.
They both posted at the same time and had different IPs.

I can do screenshots to prove it but I'd rather not because of my own rather twisted concept of occam's razor.

---

got up to here so far
i doubt manker's ability to work out how to look at IPs when he couldn't even fix a single feckin chavatar earlier:no:

---

I'm all expert and shiz now.
Didn't even need barbie :snooty:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burnsy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

I'd like to take the time right now to say to Dave that there's no hard feelings on my part. Except for the stuff you said about MBM's kid, which is unforgivable.

And nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah.

---

Seconded :lol:

---

Thanks, guys. Anyone else think Dave will turn into a second J-Dye who creates new accounts daily to no avail?

He fits the profile, does he not?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

That's right and being that lovely nice man that you are, you decided you had the right to take personal digs at my wife.

---

Yo! He's got a lot more respect for your wife than you have, eh?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burnsy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

How did you know :unsure:

---

By reading that Mum'sNet link from earlier, after the 'reject' profile on there had been banned, a 'BobBanana' profile appeared which basically continued to troll and take the same stance as our own reject had been... it could only have been him...

Then as soon as 'reject' was placed on moderation, 'BobBanana' signs up here?

Kinda obvious if you know what you're looking for :lol:

---

Excellent work young padawan, we shall be watching your career with great interest.... ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

got up to here so far
i doubt manker's ability to work out how to look at IPs when he couldn't even fix a single feckin chavatar earlier:no:

---

I'm all expert and shiz now.
Didn't even need barbie :snooty:

---

I'm here now, ask me anything... :)

Uhm, what was the name of that sci-fi author you told me was decent?
I'm reading the Caliban Trilogy by Roger MacBride Allen (Asimov tribute), and it's complete wank.

Was it Stephen Baxter?

I don't know :blink:

Coincidentally, I do have one of his books; Stone Spring - Stephen Baxter.
Not read it, but.

Edit: Five of his books, the titles aren't very sci-fi-ish though:
Conqueror, Emperor, Navigator and Weaver.

Edit2: Also, Flux, Raft, Ring, Timelike Infinity, Vacuum Diagrams and Xeelee Novellas.
They sound more sci-fi-ish

The Manifold Trilogy (Time, Space and Origin), I think they might have been the ones I was talking about.

I'm currently in the middle of Time's Tapestry and you're right, it's not very sci-fi, being set in the Roman Empire and all :dabs:

Actually I've gone orf him a bit.

My fave sci-fi author is Iain M. Banks

Ahh, yeah. Manifold, that does ring a bell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by barbie

I'm currently in the middle of Time's Tapestry and you're right, it's not very sci-fi, being set in the Roman Empire and all :dabs:

---

:lol:
Robots pwn but historical fiction is probably my favourite genre.

Oh that might be right up your street then :happy:

Yo, just got here! S'up dawgs!

nm.
We're just talking about robot secks again.

Oic. Carry on!

Okay.
Given the three laws of robotics, humaniform robots would make the best sex partners because it causes them to perceive a sensation akin to pain if they do not do everything in their power to please a human being. This would translate itself to other areas of the relationship meaning that the robot would have an unbreakable sense of duty and loyalty to its human partner. The robot would also be at the mercy of every whim of its owner, no matter how mundane and would complete each task set with relish.

I've given this some considerable thought and have decided that if they were to become available to purchase for a low price, the human race would die out within a millennia. Possibly less. It might be worth it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Okay.
Given the three laws of robotics, humaniform robots would make the best sex partners because it causes them to perceive a sensation akin to pain if they do not do everything in their power to please a human being. This would translate itself to other areas of the relationship meaning that the robot would have an unbreakable sense of duty and loyalty to its human partner. The robot would also be at the mercy of every whim of its owner, no matter how mundane and would complete each task set with relish.

I've given this some considerable thought and have decided that if they were to become available to purchase for a low price, the human race would die out within a millennia. Possibly less. It might be worth it.

---

A more probable reality is VR suits that can immerse you in touch sensation as well as aural and visual stimulii, the result would be the same, everyone would be fucking their VR girlfriend/boyfriend and we would all die out. :blink:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Artemis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Okay.
Given the three laws of robotics, humaniform robots would make the best sex partners because it causes them to perceive a sensation akin to pain if they do not do everything in their power to please a human being. This would translate itself to other areas of the relationship meaning that the robot would have an unbreakable sense of duty and loyalty to its human partner. The robot would also be at the mercy of every whim of its owner, no matter how mundane and would complete each task set with relish.

I've given this some considerable thought and have decided that if they were to become available to purchase for a low price, the human race would die out within a millennia. Possibly less. It might be worth it.

---

A more probable reality is VR suits that can immerse you in touch sensation as well as aural and visual stimulii, the result would be the same, everyone would be fucking their VR girlfriend/boyfriend and we would all die out. :blink:

---

A VR suit wouldn't be able to make me a sammich or do the ironing.

If I had a VR suit, I'd still get a real woman type woman in for practical porpoises and probably accidentally pro-create when I was drunk and couldn't work the zip of the VR suit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

A VR suit wouldn't be able to make me a sammich or do the ironing.

If I had a VR suit, I'd still get a real woman type woman in for practical porpoises and probably accidentally pro-create when I was drunk and couldn't work the zip of the VR suit.

---

I think a real woman would be required for the nasty job of cleaning the VR suit, as well. Gosh, must a married man think of all the uses for a woman? :unsure:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

A VR suit wouldn't be able to make me a sammich or do the ironing.

If I had a VR suit, I'd still get a real woman type woman in for practical porpoises and probably accidentally pro-create when I was drunk and couldn't work the zip of the VR suit.

---

I think a real woman would be required for the nasty job of cleaning the VR suit, as well. Gosh, must a married man think of all the uses for a woman? :unsure:

---

Ew.
I didn't think of that. I wonder if in my lifetime VR suits would become disposable, imagine if you accidentally put on a used one.

I think self-cleaning robots are the only way forward.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

I think a real woman would be required for the nasty job of cleaning the VR suit, as well. Gosh, must a married man think of all the uses for a woman? :unsure:

---

Ew.
I didn't think of that. I wonder if in my lifetime VR suits would become disposable, imagine if you accidentally put on a used one.

I think self-cleaning robots are the only way forward.

---

But what if the purge cycle activated prematurely? :blink:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Ew.
I didn't think of that. I wonder if in my lifetime VR suits would become disposable, imagine if you accidentally put on a used one.

I think self-cleaning robots are the only way forward.

---

I think there would need to be an international agreement signed that would make it a capital crime to record anyone having sex in a VR suit. Most people I look silly enough when they I have a partner, and finding out that they I have been put on Youtube wouldn't be good for the ego. :noes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Artemis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Ew.
I didn't think of that. I wonder if in my lifetime VR suits would become disposable, imagine if you accidentally put on a used one.

I think self-cleaning robots are the only way forward.

---

But what if the purge cycle activated prematurely? :blink:

---

I'm talking about humaniform robots, not washing machines :unsure:
They'd just take a shower after lighting your ciggie.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Ew.
I didn't think of that. I wonder if in my lifetime VR suits would become disposable, imagine if you accidentally put on a used one.

I think self-cleaning robots are the only way forward.

---

I think there would need to be an international agreement signed that would make it a capital crime to record anyone having sex in a VR suit. Most people I look silly enough when they I have a partner, and finding out that they I have been put on Youtube wouldn't be good for the ego. :noes:

---

That's why robots would be far superior. They'd record everything in their data store but would be unable to release the bits and bytes to anyone but their owner due to the embarrassment it might cause.

You'd be free to have the unit display the footage on a VDU of your choice should you be wanting to knock a quick one out before work.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

I think there would need to be an international agreement signed that would make it a capital crime to record anyone having sex in a VR suit. Most people I look silly enough when they I have a partner, and finding out that they I have been put on Youtube wouldn't be good for the ego. :noes:

---

That's why robots would be far superior. They'd record everything in their data store but would be unable to release the bits and bytes to anyone but their owner due to the embarrassment it might cause.

You'd be free to have the unit display the footage on a VDU of your choice should you be wanting to knock a quick one out before work.

---

You do realise that if the camera was mounted on the robot itself the only footage you are going to get is of yourself sweaty, reddened and making the O face, I cannot think of anything more off putting. There is no way I would be able to wind my clock to that (if it were me).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

You'd be free to have the unit display the footage on a VDU of your choice should you be wanting to knock a quick one out before work.

---

Naw, I'm usually only turned on by women who wouldn't have me... :sadwalk:

Wind my clock :lol:

Edit: it wouldn't be a camera, though. The robot would be spatially aware of every detail in the room and would be able to playback copulation from which ever angle you desired. Cgi, bruv. I imagine the robot would also depict you in the most flattering light possible, so as to decrease discomfort brought on by seeing one's flapping man bewbs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

You'd be free to have the unit display the footage on a VDU of your choice should you be wanting to knock a quick one out before work.

---

Naw, I'm usually only turned on by women who wouldn't have me... :sadwalk:

---

A wise decision and one I commend.
One doesn't like to limit one's onanistic choices :smilie4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Wind my clock :lol:

Edit: it wouldn't be a camera, though. The robot would be spatially aware of every detail in the room and would be able to playback copulation from which ever angle you desired. Cgi, bruv. I imagine the robot would also depict you in the most flattering light possible, so as to decrease discomfort brought on by seeing one's flapping man bewbs.

---

Your utopian fuckbot sounds orsum, when can I order one? :blink:

When Mary and Darthy construct it.
They'll do the grunt work, I'm the ideas man.