Is it in the Genes?

They all snogged Miriam... :unsure:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

If it looks like a woman a straight man will probably fuck himher.

---

Not necessarily, it could be than someone decides, unconciously, that he(-she) smells wrong, and therefore isn't attracted to him(-her).

---

Damn dude, do you know what probably means? :blink:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

'cos of the pheromones, see. Like I said before, that has really been proven to be a factor, although I think women make decisions based on smell more consciously than men does.

---

Pheromones? :lol: :lol: Sorry bud, but for men, visual stimuli overides pheromones in most cases. (that's one of my common sense guesses with no empirical evidence to back it up) :lol: :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

Anyway, a bloke is always a bloke, if he was born that way, IMO.
No amount of surgery and/or hormone treatments will alter that :unsure:

---

I totally agree.

So....if a man fucks a heshe unknowingly....is he homosexual?

I would bet if sex changes became verrrrrrry common, there'd be a ton of new homosexuals running around. :ohmy:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Make gender?

Tbh my favorite color is black.

---

Your favourite colour is the absence of all colours.

How poetic :unsure:

---

:devil:

I was waiting for that. However black is still my favorite color. :dry:

I stumbled across this article this morning while trying to ignore my wifes harangueing to get back into bed.(I have ran out of pills:cry:). I thought it might interest someone. it appears that they have located a gene that 'applies', 'controls' sexual preference. It is a long article, so read and make your own decisions. Dont you always.:lol:

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/06/03/news/cell.php

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

Not necessarily, it could be than someone decides, unconciously, that he(-she) smells wrong, and therefore isn't attracted to him(-her).

---

Damn dude, do you know what probably means? :blink:

---

Well, I meant that it might not be so probable, you dig? :P

I reckon that pheromones putting even a bloke off isn't as improbable as you might think.

I've met women others thought looked great, and whom I'd have thought looked right even for me, yet they didn't attract me at all.


It's all pretty uncertain really, but I think that pheromones and such are a bigger factor than you might believe. But then again that might vary from person to person. And possibly from culture to culture as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Damn dude, do you know what probably means? :blink:

---

Well, I meant that it might not be so probable, you dig? :P

I reckon that pheromones putting even a bloke off isn't as improbable as you might think.

I've met women others thought looked great, and whom I'd have thought looked right even for me, yet they didn't attract me at all.


It's all pretty uncertain really, but I think that pheromones and such are a bigger factor than you might believe. But then again that might vary from person to person. And possibly from culture to culture as well.

---

So because a great looking woman didn't attract you, it musta been the pheromones? :lol: :lol: :lol:

You know a great looking woman is more probable to get fucked and I know it.
You debate the CaptainObvious. If she fucking stinks then that's another story. If some bloke happens to like this good looking woman with the shit smell that's another story too. :dry:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

So because a great looking woman didn't attract you, it musta been the pheromones? :lol: :lol: :lol:

You know a great looking woman is more probable to get fucked and I know it.
You debate the CaptainObvious.

---

It might have been the pheromones, yeah :huh:

Just 'cause you can't see them doesn't mean that they aren't a factor.
Especially so since research has shown that they are indeed a factor.

And anyway, all people aren't guided purely by the exterior, it could be that the good-looking chick is a moron, or that she tries too hard. Of course she'll always get laid, but with who?

Undoubtedly there are people who won't care about their instincts, or about who she is. She looks good and therefore they must sleep with her, as a prestige thing or something. But I don't think those people are average, or at least I hope they are not :ermm:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

So because a great looking woman didn't attract you, it musta been the pheromones? :lol: :lol: :lol:

You know a great looking woman is more probable to get fucked and I know it.
You debate the CaptainObvious.

---

It might have been the pheromones, yeah :huh:

Just 'cause you can't see them doesn't mean that they aren't a factor.
Especially so since research has shown that they are indeed a factor.

And anyway, all people aren't guided purely by the exterior, it could be that the good-looking chick is a moron, or that she tries too hard. Of course she'll always get laid, but with who?

Undoubtedly there are people who won't care about their instincts, or about who she is. She looks good and therefore they must sleep with her, as a prestige thing or something. But I don't think those people are average, or at least I hope they are not :ermm:

---

Oh jeez!! You might not have liked a woman for many reasons.

Not my point. You made your point as if it was the pheromones that turned you off in your example.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

I reckon that pheromones putting even a bloke off isn't as improbable as you might think.
I've met women others thought looked great, and whom I'd have thought looked right even for me, yet they didn't attract me at all.

---

.....yet you have no idea.....even with scientific research saying it is a factor.

I know you don't have to see pheromones. I don't see stink either. Noshizzle. :blink:

Good lord, then you go into whether she's a moron or not. :blink:

A woman walking down the street is going to be seen first and foremost. Visual stimuli.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Good lord, then you go into whether she's a moron or not. :blink:

A woman walking down the street is going to be seen first and foremost. Visual stimuli.

---

Do you treat everything in life so capriciously, old bean, or is it just in your choice of bedfellows.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Good lord, then you go into whether she's a moron or not. :blink:

A woman walking down the street is going to be seen first and foremost. Visual stimuli.

---

Do you treat everything in life so capriciously, old bean, or is it just in your choice of bedfellows.

---

Deary me, bedfellows! That's a big ambiguous.

There merest hint of sexual deviancy usually has our chum Busy wishing to masticate the implicator's testes until viscous.

Please, pay more heed to your comments to avoid unintended ramifications.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

Do you treat everything in life so capriciously, old bean, or is it just in your choice of bedfellows.

---

Deary me, bedfellows! That's a big ambiguous.

There merest hint of sexual deviancy usually has our chum Busy wishing to masticate the implicator's testes until viscous.

Please, pay more heed to your comments to avoid unintended ramifications.

---

My rastamafarians are generally intended.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Deary me, bedfellows! That's a big ambiguous.

There merest hint of sexual deviancy usually has our chum Busy wishing to masticate the implicator's testes until viscous.

Please, pay more heed to your comments to avoid unintended ramifications.

---

My rastamafarians are generally intended.

---

As is my roddage :naughty:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

My rastamafarians are generally intended.

---

As is my roddage :naughty:

---

Read what I wrote, :cawk:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Please, pay more heed to your comments to avoid unintended ramifications.

---

Are you accusing me of JPaulism, or zeugma as it's known in the trade.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

As is my roddage :naughty:

---

Read what I wrote, :cawk:

---

So you weren't trying to imply that you meant to be a bit naughty, noblet.

Trois - deux - and not in favour of the senescent simulacrum.

Nuture or Nature? There's statistics for nature. But I've also seen half dozen of 1 = 6 of the other.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

It might have been the pheromones, yeah :huh:

Just 'cause you can't see them doesn't mean that they aren't a factor.
Especially so since research has shown that they are indeed a factor.

And anyway, all people aren't guided purely by the exterior, it could be that the good-looking chick is a moron, or that she tries too hard. Of course she'll always get laid, but with who?

Undoubtedly there are people who won't care about their instincts, or about who she is. She looks good and therefore they must sleep with her, as a prestige thing or something. But I don't think those people are average, or at least I hope they are not :ermm:

---

Oh jeez!! You might not have liked a woman for many reasons.

---

:rolleyes:

I might not have liked that woman for many reasons, true. But seeing as how there wasn't always been an explanation for it, then I have to assume it was because of something I couldn't see.

Sure, some women are too daft to like, and some are weird in other ways, but not all of them.

Sometimes there's no visible or otherwise obvious reason as to why I like one and abhor another, therefore I have to assume it's because of something unconcious and uncontrollable, like pheromones, unless you've got something better to explain it with.

Attraction-gnomes perhaps?

Quote:

---

Not my point. You made your point as if it was the pheromones that turned you off in your example.....

---

Given the science, it has to be the most logical explanation, yeah.


Oh, and maybe you'll sleep with anything that looks good walking down the street :ermm:

But I won't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

Oh, and maybe you'll sleep with anything that looks good walking down the street :ermm:

But I won't.

---

Too many tawdry memories of the guy dressed up as a cheeseburger? I knows it :no:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Oh jeez!! You might not have liked a woman for many reasons.

---

:rolleyes:

I might not have liked that woman for many reasons, true. But seeing as how there wasn't always been an explanation for it, then I have to assume it was because of something I couldn't see.

Sure, some women are too daft to like, and some are weird in other ways, but not all of them.

Sometimes there's no visible or otherwise obvious reason as to why I like one and abhor another, therefore I have to assume it's because of something unconcious and uncontrollable, like pheromones, unless you've got something better to explain it with.

Attraction-gnomes perhaps?

Quote:

---

Not my point. You made your point as if it was the pheromones that turned you off in your example.....

---

Given the science, it has to be the most logical explanation, yeah.


Oh, and maybe you'll sleep with anything that looks good walking down the street :ermm:

But I won't.

---

I guess you wouldn't 'cause the pheromones said not to.

So this....

Quote:

---

So because a great looking woman didn't attract you, it musta been the pheromones? :lol: :lol: :lol:

---

...was accurate then.

Cool.

I can't explain why I like/dislike many things. However, I don't automatically attribute a reason to the newest scientific study. :lol: :lol:

It's hardly recent at all. That theory, and others like it have been around for several decades at the very least



And btw, on the subject of attraction: I hear women go through different phases with regards what they are attracted too.

When ovulating, or somesuch, they prefer men with more feminine traits, possibly increasingly so when pregnant and when they've born their child, until the point when their nipples don't lactate any more.

That's all hormones, and men have other such phases which affect what they are attracted to, I think, but it's more age-related, I reckon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

That's all hormones, and men have other such phases which affect what they are attracted to, I think, but it's more age-related, I reckon.

---

Leave me alone.:ph34r: It was just a face phase I was going through.:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

It's hardly recent at all. That theory, and others like it have been around for several decades at the very least



And btw, on the subject of attraction: I hear women go through different phases with regards what they are attracted too.

When ovulating, or somesuch, they prefer men with more feminine traits, possibly increasingly so when pregnant and when they've born their child, until the point when their nipples don't lactate any more.

That's all hormones, and men have other such phases which affect what they are attracted to, I think, but it's more age-related, I reckon.

---

Did you say theory? Oh mmk.

Regarding attraction, I hear many women wanting to fuck more during ovulation. Maybe what you heard is fact too....or is it theory? :blink:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

It's hardly recent at all. That theory, and others like it have been around for several decades at the very least



And btw, on the subject of attraction: I hear women go through different phases with regards what they are attracted too.

When ovulating, or somesuch, they prefer men with more feminine traits, possibly increasingly so when pregnant and when they've born their child, until the point when their nipples don't lactate any more.

That's all hormones, and men have other such phases which affect what they are attracted to, I think, but it's more age-related, I reckon.

---

Did you say theory? Oh mmk.

Regarding attraction, I hear many women wanting to fuck more during ovulation. Maybe what you heard is fact too....or is it theory? :blink:

---

No they want to do it two months after the baby is born. It's known as thermidor, the eleventh month, also known as the month of heat (well it was in the French revolutionary calender, apparentement)

@busy: It's supposedly a fact, as it has been proven empirically, more or less, but there are still some kinks to iron out I reckon, which is why I'm calling it a theory.

Incomplete research might be a better way to name it then, as they have yet to find out exactly what pheromones accomplish what, and so forth.


WRT ovulation, the test I know of was performed by showing groups of women in various phases of their menstrual cycle a series of pictures or stages of a male face slowly being morphed into a female face (cunningly done on a computer).

It might have been those women who had just gone past ovulating though, it could be that those just about to picked the more male face, now that I think about it.

It's been a while since I read about it.

At any rate the theory, which was based on the fact that women really do pick people with different traits depending on where in the cycle they currently are, is that it's to do with picking a partner with better genes (more male-looking apparently) versus picking a partner who will take care of you better (mor female, again apparently).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

And btw, on the subject of attraction: I hear women go through different phases with regards what they are attracted too.

---

Its all hormones etc..

Changing the Pill they're on can change what attracts them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

@busy: It's supposedly a fact, as it has been proven empirically, more or less, but there are still some kinks to iron out I reckon, which is why I'm calling it a theory.

Incomplete research might be a better way to name it then, as they have yet to find out exactly what pheromones accomplish what, and so forth.


WRT ovulation, the test I know of was performed by showing groups of women in various phases of their menstrual cycle a series of pictures or stages of a male face slowly being morphed into a female face (cunningly done on a computer).

It might have been those women who had just gone past ovulating though, it could be that those just about to picked the more male face, now that I think about it.

It's been a while since I read about it.

At any rate the theory, which was based on the fact that women really do pick people with different traits depending on where in the cycle they currently are, is that it's to do with picking a partner with better genes (more male-looking apparently) versus picking a partner who will take care of you better (mor female, again apparently).

---

So theory then. Cool.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Did you say theory? Oh mmk.

Regarding attraction, I hear many women wanting to fuck more during ovulation. Maybe what you heard is fact too....or is it theory? :blink:

---

No they want to do it two months after the baby is born. It's known as thermidor, the eleventh month, also known as the month of heat (well it was in the French revolutionary calender, apparentement)

---

They only want it two months after the baby is born? That sucks. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

No they want to do it two months after the baby is born. It's known as thermidor, the eleventh month, also known as the month of heat (well it was in the French revolutionary calender, apparentement)

---

They only want it two months after the baby is born? That sucks. :(

---

:w00t: