Printable View
How does it f**king happen that MBT overall is [5]?? It has absolutely unique content, V0/lac rips which are not on waffles or what.cd or any other tracker??
Also, it's one big coding masterpiece, so many options there. I'd say it must be [10] but it's very little tracker to have 10. But at least [9]!
It also has very dedicated commenity, atm of posting this shellife has 680 users with 13000 seeders, it's absolutely wonderful
Absolutely
So, i suggest giving MBT (rename to shellife, plz) [9]
i lol'dQuote:
Originally Posted by Convectuoso
Piratebits.org has had open signup for time now. I think it should move one lvl down.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Convectuoso
Tracker Ratings
- Trackers have ratings from 1 to 10 in the [#] tags.
- This is based on Content and Speed and Pre-Times.
How many active torrents do you host? Sure your user/peer ratio may be high, but how do your peers compare to waffles or whatcd? THEY are rated 9, so your obviously biased opinion of a 10 or 9 is ridiculous based on the criteria for ratings. I admit the ratings are a work in progress and I encourage more people to be like you and complain about them so they can be fine tuned. I assume your speeds are average for a music tracker and have no clue about pre-times. If you only allow v0/flac then the content rating could be higher despite a lower torrent count. Please elaborate on your tracker based on those 3 criteria and the rating will be altered appropriately :)
Well, my opinion isQuote:
Originally Posted by T.S.O.L.Quote:
Originally Posted by Convectuoso
Tracker Ratings
- Trackers have ratings from 1 to 10 in the [#] tags.
- This is based on Content and Speed and Pre-Times.
How many active torrents do you host? Sure your user/peer ratio may be high, but how do your peers compare to waffles or whatcd? THEY are rated 9, so your obviously biased opinion of a 10 or 9 is ridiculous based on the criteria for ratings. I admit the ratings are a work in progress and I encourage more people to be like you and complain about them so they can be fine tuned. I assume your speeds are average for a music tracker and have no clue about pre-times. If you only allow v0/flac then the content rating could be higher despite a lower torrent count. Please elaborate on your tracker based on those 3 criteria and the rating will be altered appropriately :)
Content 10/10
Speeds 6/10, not fast at all
Pre-times: it's not 0-day tracker and it is not scene-friendly. No pre-times here
At the moment it has 7,653 torrents
damn, just noticed we went up a level lol
better hurry up with this referal system, before i get a nose bleed for being to high up in this. :)
I signed up and was quite impressed. My first impression was an Indietorrents with more content and less snatches, and also a somewhat comparable tracker to Libble but with a unique design. I moved your rating up to 7, which is pretty fair if not generous compared to the other music trackers on the list.Quote:
Originally Posted by Convectuoso
lolz took ya awhile to notice it this time :PQuote:
Originally Posted by stoi
I don't get this whole level thing. For example, I just noticed BMTV moved to level 3. I'm guessing this is because of open signups; but, obviously, those signups are finished. Now it's just as hard to get into as when it was "level 5" difficulty, and as I view the user total on the front page, it seems a lot of those newly created accounts are getting deleted. So I'm not really sure what to think about it at all, but if it stops people from trading it, then by all means. ;)
I think the 'idea' is that there are alot more accounts and therefore it's easier to obtain in a trade. However you are right, trackers should climb the scale after they close up depending on the demand. How many users got deleted from BMTV? They have over 24k right now, and I have no clue what they were at before they opened up..Quote:
Originally Posted by integral
If enough ppl request for a tracker to move up or down and back it up with a solid reason it will probably happen.
There were just under 19,000 on BitMeTV before it opened signups.
Why move BCG to level 3 as it will move down again when the new invite system kicks in? There are no invites just now, and since FST does not permit account trading it seems pointless to move BCG to level 3.
if FST does not allow account trading of BCG, and we have no Invites, then whats the point of BCG being in the list at all, same for all the other trackers that are on here with CR.
just something to throw out there.
Seems pointless to remove BCG | FSC | FTN | ITS when they have no invites, as these are the only four trackers where accounts cannot be traded, only to add it again when invites are opened.
I can only speak for iTS but invites haven't been open for a long a time and won't be in the forseeable future.Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyX
always an answer lol
I give up with this thread now, everyone knows my view on this, everyone even the mods and higher ranked staff, know my suggestions to improve it, if it ever gets done that is.
so i wash my hands of it, let some other sucker take over and show what a waste of time this really is.
(btw i bet i make another post in here this week, i dont want to, i just wont be able to help myself lol)
i just cant see how its a good thing at all.
I'm a sucker. :cry:
Plus won. :smilie4:Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyX
I thought you were an arsehole before, but now i know you are.
is there any need to even put any of that crap in this thread. its like me telling members of here how to cheat and not get caught.
and that is exactly why this thread as it is, is a load of bollocks, but why would an SPU give up his account, hes worked pretty hard at it, and whats he going to get out of it, demonoid.
honestly mate your an ass of the highest order
It's being worked on.Quote:
Originally Posted by stoi
Actually, tesco is on vacation so it isn't being worked on for about another 10 days at least, but it's coming. ;)
yeah skizo i know, TSOL has already Pmed me, but i didnt want to let it slip in here, so i made it sound as if i didnt know anything about it lol
We try to do something good for our members, and some scumbags have to spoil it.
well the external invite forum is no more on BCG and will never ever be coming back.
aom and iTS should go up ! no doubts
and it's gonna be much better i believe :yup:Quote:
Originally Posted by SkizoIt's being worked on.Quote:
Originally Posted by stoi
Actually, tesco is on vacation so it isn't being worked on for about another 10 days at least, but it's coming. ;)
someone make a review of SDBits and add it please :)
stoi, why are you striving so hard to get bcg off this pointless list?
looks like bcg will be 4 again soon anyway....obviously still in demand for content.
stoi, why are you striving so hard to get bcg off this pointless list?
you just said it yourself, its a pointless list so whats the point of being on it.
I just hate how there is no respect at all for those down the bottom of this list, its like trade if you want, cheat if you want, they dont care, well we do, or i do anyway.
well said m8 I am sure there are trackers on that list that are far better than ones on it.Quote:
Originally Posted by stoi
There are also some specalist trackers that people say should be made that already exist and are very good :)
One I know of has no scene releases (due to scene do not cover the topic at all) that I think would automatically be hi up on the list and get a 10 as I know of no other tracker with the content they have on that subject. In fact I bet only a handful of people who post here even know of it and I know several that would want it and this might result in traded accounts etc etc
swedvdr should go up swedvdr its more rare then tt a lot more
no you dontQuote:
Originally Posted by stoi
HDbits down atleast one level - invites open again
http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bit...again-308382/?
I think most consider it was lvl 4 even withought closed invites, for quit a while actually.Quote:
Originally Posted by kondrae
if hdbits never open invQuote:
Originally Posted by kondrae
it should be at least lvl5(the staff like bimetv:D)
this open ,only have 1 inv for ppl (old inv removed,stays lvl4 is reasonable)
ps:hdbits maybe the one hard trackets to regist as i know(need answer 3 questions,if 2 wrong 88 the hdbits:lol:)
Pretorians should be back to level 3. Sign up closed, and you can get an invite for 2 TB.
Why FTN have Tracker Ratings = 6. Few month ago (if i good remember) have 10. Now have less torrents?
I wonder what's the reason to use this rating...There're almost no trades now especially trades involving high profile trackers.
why did snowtigers move down?
if it has a 6, that means quality, not rarityQuote:
Originally Posted by AugustoP
I figure by logic SCT would move up to a high "rarity" level, since you can no longer simply donate for invites.
Exactly!Quote:
Originally Posted by integral
It should be more than level 4, and I think nobody would deny it that ScT is one of the best and (maybe) hardest sites to be invited in.:dabs:
I'm not talking about the FTN (I know why it has such a low quality rating) I'm talking about the WIAW list itself. I think it outlived its usefulness and it's time to let the market decide the value of invites and accounts. Basically that's what's going on de-facto - the WIAW list gives you only the most basic idea what's your high level invite worth. Another thing is that accounts have much less liquidity than before - sometime ago you could easily retrade the unneeded account which is not the case now so basing your trading decisions on the list is not the safe.Quote:
Originally Posted by jukestaif it has a 6, that means quality, not rarityQuote:
Originally Posted by AugustoP
wats TTC, it shouldnt be on the list if it has no reviews