Take what you want? Including maybe your life. :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
j2 wtf? You've got 6 corners of guns and stars scattered around? WTF is wrong with you....you could stub your toe. :ohmy:
Printable View
Take what you want? Including maybe your life. :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
j2 wtf? You've got 6 corners of guns and stars scattered around? WTF is wrong with you....you could stub your toe. :ohmy:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420
Hungerford and that guy that went into the school with a handgun a few years back spring to mind. Jpaul pointed out that it is not a daily event but things do happen You do also have "gang related" shootings.Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
I would like to point out that even the UK has shooting rampages every now and then.
Lets not be ignorant of each others problems. The UK does have a limited gun problem, it is just fortunate to not be ANYWHERE near the problem we have in the USA and this IMO has a lot to do with the laws and availability regarding munitions.
The Uk does have a limited gun problem but it is limited because of the general attitude towards gun ownership.
Why would he shoot me and steal my stuff when he could just steal my stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
That doesn't make sense, but then I'm not a paranoid gun owner.
Obviously so since you can't carry guns. DUH.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnnY
What is your maniac per capita ratio?
Nevertheless we will have more murders since there is way more population.
Yes, but it would appear that compared to my country, or the UK, you have more murders percentage-wise, which is the important bit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
I'm sure every country in the world has their fair share of maniacs, but I'll take the ones without firearms if I have the choice.
60 million is not much compared to 200 million but compare the size of the UK to USAQuote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
and statitics i've seen are measured in percentage so the population size is irrelevent.
and to top it off i don't even know why you said that
The gangland bit wasn't your original point, it is a problem but my point to you (and a genuine objection to the wording of your post) was that shooting rampages don't happen "every now and then" that indicates a greater frequency than the actual truth tells. Hungerford happened 18 years ago for instance and Dunblane was nearly 10 years ago...Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
Oh my goodness....Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Because some people are irrational and stupid.
You would think that drug dealers would make their money and not shoot others on street corners, you know, to not draw more attention to their bread and butter....yet they do it.
You would think if someone would just take one's stuff and not kill them that it would mean less importance placed on the crime meaning more likelihood of getting away with it......yet they shoot.
I just realized that it may just really come down to me being more of realist when it comes to the world.
You are making logic out of the irrational and it doesn't work. I've thought about this years ago but came up with logical solutions to an irrational world.
...and it still might not work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
thanks :blushing:
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnnY