good idea
Printable View
good idea
An example is... A number of my friends and I, who have FTWR, E***O, and UK-T, rarely use them trackers... The trackers we actually use most of the time are TL, OiNK, and BitMeTV.
I think the whole point of implementing a new tracker rating system is to treat all trackers fairly and equally (in terms of speed, content, pretimes, and rarity).
yeah but in the wiaw thread each tracker has ratings in brackets which is on content speed etc. so there not getting ignored it shows people that TL is a good site just that its not very rare
i am im not stopping any1 from speaking am i. im just making my oppinion which i am entitled to do
there something wrong, TL could not ever be level 7 from 10, i would rate the trackers below level 6 with a total of 6 points or 5 instead of 10 ...
This is a very good way to measure the quality of a tracker.
i'll repeat myself but i think that the actual system is just fine...
but if a tracker is impossible to get into because nobody are willing to trade it on FST for weeks, then just remove it from the ratings since it's useless to have it there ... until we see some offer
seriously, why are we here? the majority are trackers collectors and in every type of collection there is some rare stuff and every single type of collection have a value based on the rarity
just start another thread called, the hall of fame of trackers or whatever but leave the WIAW as it is
ok, let's not change the current rating system, but could we just post a table of trackers according to content and speed or etc. so that those who does NOT have the Top level trackers knows why in the end, it's all about contents and quality not rarity.