Re: What.Cd's Lack of Seeders
the lack of seeders is real bad. I almost dl 100 percent waffles now.
Re: What.Cd's Lack of Seeders
i d/l and can't seed bad...gg
Re: What.Cd's Lack of Seeders
Well, I don't think we are able to attribute lack of seeds to the site being 'young' as much, the site seems to be sadly slowing down quite drastically.
Re: What.Cd's Lack of Seeders
Quote:
Originally Posted by
grimms
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TP635
There is no lack of seeders; the opposite is true. There is little leeching activities in there except those torrents that are on FL. There are tons of files that I would love to dl but I would rather get them from elsewhere. cos I know I will need be able to seed back and regain my ratio.
As long as they have no seed bonus system this situation will go on for a very long time. And then...
I agree with you on that. They need some type of
seed bonus system. I don't see it being implemented int he near future though.
The staff shot the idea down. There was a long thread in the forum about it. Well the way I see it they just shot down the tracker
Re: What.Cd's Lack of Seeders
i don't like lossless so already, most of the stuff on what.cd is useless to me. I think i've downloaded 2 albums total in my 2+ months being on that site, because it's impossible to get a good ratio. For the record, I wasn't with oink beforehand either.
Re: What.Cd's Lack of Seeders
I've never had a issue, downloaded plenty & just seed everything back - every seeds over time to well over 1 in ratio terms.
Sure you don't have a huge volume of people jumping on every single file, but give it a few days & you'll be fine.
Excellent for a still new tracker IMHO
Re: What.Cd's Lack of Seeders
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Schoolboystuff
I've never had a issue, downloaded plenty & just seed everything back - every seeds over time to well over 1 in ratio terms.
Sure you don't have a huge volume of people jumping on every single file, but give it a few days & you'll be fine.
Excellent for a still new tracker IMHO
I have files from last months that upload only less than 1mb; and I was seeding 24/7. I just stop seeding cos my client is now banned.
Re: What.Cd's Lack of Seeders
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wilson47
i don't like lossless so already, most of the stuff on what.cd is useless to me. I think i've downloaded 2 albums total in my 2+ months being on that site, because it's impossible to get a good ratio. For the record, I wasn't with oink beforehand either.
Waffles is excellent for a new tracker. What is struggling, and it's clear to the staff that their policies are inferior to Waffles, which is why they've made their PU requirement almost identical to Waffles, culled their user base to match Waffle's seeder/leecher ratio, and cut back on invites.
I don't like comparing the two either, but the What staff themselves are making that comparison and doing their best to compensate for a significant disadvantage. Not as if this was a competition in the first place, of course. ;)
Re: What.Cd's Lack of Seeders
hmm i guess they need to have a bit of freeleeches if they dont have it
Re: What.Cd's Lack of Seeders
Shame neither site can sort out their 'scene' rip rules. At last 1/3 of supposed scene rips aren't scene at all or fail the sfv check.