Cool stuff. I like the idea a lot. I think those threads are really lacking myself. The WTAW thread is just silly and the WTO thread is way too clunky.
Printable View
Cool stuff. I like the idea a lot. I think those threads are really lacking myself. The WTAW thread is just silly and the WTO thread is way too clunky.
well the reason i came up with this idea was, because i just think the way it is done atm.
Everyone can read the WTO thread, and lets be honest its not the easiest to read and its very out of date, and a lot of info and trackers are missing from it.
Then we have the WTAW thread, which again lets be honest, its main emphasis is rarity, so members read it and it seems to me at least, rarity is the be all and end all of why a tracker is ranked and how good it is.
This way, all the oprions are in 1 list. witch is sortable, so if you want to sort by rarity you can, but its not the main emphasis of the list, every column has its own equal emphasis to the user thats sorting.
OK it may take awhile for members to not go straight to the Rarity sort column, but im sure that after awhile rarity wont mean that big of a deal, and we can judge trackers for what they are there for, to be used and wether it will be a place you would like or not.
I do think the reviews could be re-written as well, and by an impartial member (not staff of that tracker) and in the review, actually explain how you got those numbers for this table, just a lot more in depth than a bunch of screenshots from 6 months ago type thing.