Poor Obama

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 999969999

Lucifer, why don't you provide us with some proof from one of your own posts where you "acknowledge democrat hypocrisy, corruption, outright lies, or any other of their myriad human foibles."

---

Because it's the job of the accuser to lay out the evidence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devilsadvocate

Ah, one size fits all grouping, I see. I look forward to being generalized.

---

It's self-inflicted in your case, Lucy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devilsadvocate

ah, one size fits all grouping, i see. I look forward to being generalized.

---

it's self-inflicted in your case, lucy.

---

lol!

Gee, I didn't see any reference to Black Panthers or ACORN...you sure that was the real Faux, Kev?

So, a right wing douchenozzle has called for an investigation based on nothing...no evidence of disenfranchised voters whatsoever...and Kev inflates it into proof of an organized and pervasive Democratic attempt to steal the election.
Christ, you make Chicken Little appear calm in comparison.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devilsadvocate

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 999969999

Lucifer, why don't you provide us with some proof from one of your own posts where you "acknowledge democrat hypocrisy, corruption, outright lies, or any other of their myriad human foibles."

---

Because it's the job of the accuser to lay out the evidence.

---

Or because you can't find any.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devilsadvocate

So a republican calling for an investigation must mean it's certain that someone is deliberately trying to prevent absentee votes? or does it just show that we have incompetence and an imperfect delivery system? We could run with examples of suspected attempted voter suppression from all sides of the political spectrum, doesn't make it so, does it?

Michelle Bachmann called for investigations of lawmakers to "expose" their anti Americanism, so that must mean they are anti American.

Is sheriff Arpaio trying to stop illegals from voting or is he trying to intimidate Hispanic voters?

---

I'll check back in a few days to see if you have gotten a grasp on reality.

---

Have You? You obviously have absolutely no clue what the hell you're talking about....yet again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by l33tpirata13

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

I'll check back in a few days to see if you have gotten a grasp on reality.

---

Have You? You obviously have absolutely no clue what the hell you're talking about....yet again.

---

Hey, you've already maxed-out your credibility-deficit over immigration.

Don't push it.


Here's a wee tidbit for Lucy:

http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/e...106727208.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by l33tpirata13

Have You? You obviously have absolutely no clue what the hell you're talking about....yet again.

---

Hey, you've already maxed-out your credibility-deficit over immigration.

Don't push it.


Here's a wee tidbit for Lucy:

http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/e...106727208.html

---

These things happen to all parties, in all elections. I think it is called an oversight. I coud be wrong, but Florida keeps springing to my mind. Might just be old age.:cry:

Here is what a U.K. candidate got up to during the election. Also the action taken by the U.K. court.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...s-3-years.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

I coud be wrong, but Florida keeps springing to my mind. Might just be old age.:cry:

---

You are wrong, Bob, but that was ten years ago, and you were younger then.

In 2004 the election was decided in a state where the person who certified the vote, the secretary of state, was also the Bush campaign manager in that state.
In 2000 it was Florida, 2004 Ohio.
Yes I was wrong it was Florida and Ohio.:rolleyes: