:)Quote:
Originally posted by Biggles+4 February 2004 - 01:52--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Biggles @ 4 February 2004 - 01:52)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-J'Pol@4 February 2004 - 00:46
Millions of Germans may well have felt cheated, however as I understand it he wasn't one of them.
True although as the Austro-Hungerians actually started WW1 perhaps he had a sense of guilt and empathy.
Being fairly loopy probably had a part to play too.
I think the dividing line between say an Austrian and a Bavarian is slim. I recall a match in the World Cup a few years ago between the two countries which demonstrated this better than any words I can muster. :blink: [/b][/quote]
I too remember said match (I think) a very embarrassing affair for both the countries and FIFA as I recall.
Not a great many shots on goal.
Anyhow, sorry for being facetious. I just find the whole reasoning behind the thread annoying. The opening post which suggested that to be an atheist was somehow a more scientific position than to believe in God is unfounded.
I really cannot abide sanctimonious atheism. It is often based on preconceptions with regard to what people who believe in God actually believe. It refuses to accept that we see some of the teachings as being apocryphal and appropriate to the times.
Strangely the sanctimonious atheist is as literal as the fundamentalist.
Forgive my wandering, the apple is strong in me.