This is a completly different core. The 2.4C would overclock a ton, but how do you know the 2.4E will?
Plus they run hotter...wouldnt he be better of getting a 2.4C just because it is cooler. Reviews have said there is no performance increase...
Printable View
This is a completly different core. The 2.4C would overclock a ton, but how do you know the 2.4E will?
Plus they run hotter...wouldnt he be better of getting a 2.4C just because it is cooler. Reviews have said there is no performance increase...
rofl forget the 2.4E its on a 533mhz bus <_<Quote:
Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@9 May 2004 - 08:00
This is a completly different core. The 2.4C would overclock a ton, but how do you know the 2.4E will?
Plus they run hotter...wouldnt he be better of getting a 2.4C just because it is cooler. Reviews have said there is no performance increase...
get a 2.8E
how come i didnt know that :huh:
Wouldnt 2.8C be better?
ATI, you say your not an nvidia fanboy, but in your avatar you say you want a 6800Ultra, even though the ATI X800XT is a better card. Whats up with that? And dont say its not a better card...because everyone thinks it is.
crap now im confused! what do I get the 2.4c or the 2.4e or do i get the 2.8e or the 2.8c? holy shit someone help me!
On a review I saw, it says that the best bet would be a 2.8C, because it runs cooler and just as fast as the 2.8E. Cooler means better for overclocking.
thanks bigdawg :D
I would wait for some more answers though...
waiting....
On toms hardware...the 2.8C wins some test, 2.8E wins others...the 1Mb of L2 cache really help..but makes it alot hotter so here is what I would do.
If I was gona overclock I would get a 2.8C
If I wasnt gona overclock, I would get 2.8E
I dont know if 2.8E is good for overclocking or not.
id say 2.8e
yu can still OC it, and the extra cache really helps for speed :)