Still no competition for the Athlon 64's or the P4's which Peat Moss is looking at though.Quote:
Originally posted by kaiweiler+11 July 2004 - 05:12--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler @ 11 July 2004 - 05:12)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Super Dude@11 July 2004 - 01:10
As for the Celerons, Intel's new Celeron D is proving to be a serious competitor for Amd's Athlon Xps.
I still say stay away from the Celerons [/b][/quote]
Why, of course.I mean, who would compare a 2500+ or a 2.66Ghz Celeron D at stock speeds with an A64 or a P4 3.2?
A Celeron D, overclocked to 3.8 Ghz, in some benchmarks, performed better than a 2.8E, and other benchmarks, on par with a 3.2E.And it can easily be overclocked to 3.8Ghz with simple air cooling.
I've made a thread about the new Celerons, so you can add your opinions there.