How come hdbits.org has content rating of 7, same as bit-hdtv and hdbits.ro? It should be 9 or even 10 - it's THE place for hd content with lots of exclusive stuff.
Printable View
How come hdbits.org has content rating of 7, same as bit-hdtv and hdbits.ro? It should be 9 or even 10 - it's THE place for hd content with lots of exclusive stuff.
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by AugustoP
i think 10 for HDbits it's the best!Quote:
Originally Posted by AugustoP
If TL is only 9, then I don't think that hdbits.org deserves 10 :noes:Quote:
Originally Posted by GaleaNaturi think 10 for HDbits it's the best!Quote:
Originally Posted by AugustoP
Maybe TL should be 10, and hdbits 8 or 9 :whistling
TL = general 0-day site - Not the bestQuote:
Originally Posted by tupacIf TL is only 9, then I don't think that hdbits.org deserves 10 :noes:Quote:
Originally Posted by GaleaNatur
Maybe TL should be 10, and hdbits 8 or 9 :whistling
HDBits = HD only site - THE best HD site
Now you see why it should be 10?
TL = general 0-day site - The bestQuote:
Originally Posted by PoOkiTL = general 0-day site - Not the bestQuote:
Originally Posted by tupac
HDBits = HD only site - THE best HD site
Now you see why it should be 10?
HDBits = HD only site - THE best HD site? Maybe, I don't care. But it's just HD content, an unimportant category (the main categorys would be: 0day, DVDRs, TV shows, music, e-learning) . No matter how good a HD site is, I wouldn't rate it 10. So that you can understand, here is another example: no matter how good is a wrestling tracker (amazing pre-times, amazing speed, etc.), I wouldn't rate it 10, because it's a wrestling tracker. You just can't compare these with sites like TL,FTN,SCT,SweDVDR,BitmeTV,Bitme,Oink.
it doesn't matter what the site is about .Quote:
Originally Posted by tupacTL = general 0-day site - The bestQuote:
Originally Posted by PoOki
HDBits = HD only site - THE best HD site? Maybe, I don't care. But it's just HD content, an unimportant category (the main categorys would be: 0day, DVDRs, TV shows, music, e-learning) . No matter how good a HD site is, I wouldn't rate it 10. So that you can understand, here is another example: no matter how good is a wrestling tracker (amazing pre-times, amazing speed, etc.), I wouldn't rate it 10, because it's a wrestling tracker. You just can't compare these with sites like TL,FTN,SCT,SweDVDR,BitmeTV,Bitme,Oink.
like OINK is only music and alitlle bit of more things... but he still 9 [ no ? ]
its about the content in the tracker's area of torrents .
like trackers that dealing with TV SHOWS or Wrestling ... they only dealing with that, not 0day ... .
HDBits and any other highdef trackers are colored blue, which specifically means "dedicated tracker". Isn't that a clear indication that those trackers don't fit into any main categories and should therefore only be compared to each other? This rating isn't about public interest in highdef but about the quality this tracker displays.Quote:
Originally Posted by tupac
At the moment, the trackers with exclusively hd content are the following and their rating is wrong. One month ago I asked for a similar change in those ratings and those reasons are still true today. I don't care if HDBits.org gets a 10 or 9 or even 8, but I DO care about a distinction between the best of the best and some mediocre tracker.
HDBITS.ro Level 2 [7]
BiT-HDTV Level 2 [7]
HDBits Level 4 [7]
I know that the dedicated trackers are coloured in blue. But that doesen't change my opinion that: a wrestling or car-racing or HD tracker can't be ranked lvl10 content-wise. The best 0day tracker will be always better than the best HD tracker :whistling, because 0day content > HD content. And the ratings should reflect that.Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielHDBits and any other highdef trackers are colored blue, which specifically means "dedicated tracker". Isn't that a clear indication that those trackers don't fit into any main categories and should therefore only be compared to each other? This rating isn't about public interest in highdef but about the quality this tracker displays.Quote:
Originally Posted by tupac
At the moment, the trackers with exclusively hd content are the following and their rating is wrong. One month ago I asked for a similar change in those ratings and those reasons are still true today. I don't care if HDBits.org gets a 10 or 9 or even 8, but I DO care about a distinction between the best of the best and some mediocre tracker.
HDBITS.ro Level 2 [7]
BiT-HDTV Level 2 [7]
HDBits Level 4 [7]
totally agree...Quote:
Originally Posted by marksman