I love lamp
EDIT: Cinemageddon lvl1 (9)... Extremely great amount of rare content. You can find more stuff on CG than KG. CG is highly underrated in all aspects.
Printable View
I love lamp
EDIT: Cinemageddon lvl1 (9)... Extremely great amount of rare content. You can find more stuff on CG than KG. CG is highly underrated in all aspects.
I think BlackCats[10] should be on 4lv. Now it's hard to get. You newer get BCG if you propose lv 3 for it.
Does actually the staff of FST care these sentences,really wondering...
I think What.cd should be on lvl4
power users and above get/have tons of invites, it's not really that hard to come by compared to wafflesQuote:
Originally Posted by TomSawyer
Stoi isn't going to be happy when he reads this. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by zdzichu007
Why not?:blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Funkin'Stoi isn't going to be happy when he reads this. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by zdzichu007
lol i read it just after he posted it, I just cant be arsed to argue the toss anymore in all honesty.
but we do have
Total codes used and unused 920
Codes that remain ungenerated by the userbase 13640
codes generated, valid and unused 0
Complete codes generated but unsuccessful signup 110
Codes that have expired before use 328
Users signed up by referral 482
13,640 codes to be used in the db and thats just for our SPU and testing stages.
I honestly do not know how many it will be when we release it fully, but the number above, is more referrals than some trackers at lvl 4 have members lol
so no i dont think we should go up, but then like i mentioned, im sick of arguing the toss about this thread, ive said my peace, fuck it from now on.
Can someone explain to me why S*L is so far down considering there's under 3000 members on the site?
Thorsland needs to go up from level 4, since Invites have been disabled for months now. Other level 4 trackers (e.g bitme) do have invites available.
BlackCats should be actually removed and stop being talked of.
REASON: Coz Its going "Private". Soon only the super staff there will have accounts, all others will be disabled. LOL
well thats the 1 thing i agree with you, i wish it will be removed.
but for your information, there is 14,000 referrals in the system, thats more referrals than most sites have users and thats only in the testing stages.
So i dont know how you get this idea that it will be just the staff soon.
He's just bitter about losing his account. And it was nobody's fault but his own. I wouldn't pay much attention to him.
Well i have a note about Snowtigers , why it is in level 3 since alot of months !!
they don't have invite system and it's very vert hard to get.
Total codes used and unused 1576
Codes that remain ungenerated by the userbase 37669
codes generated, valid and unused 11
Complete codes generated but unsuccessful signup 205
Codes that have expired before use 543
Users signed up by referral 817
surely we should be lvl 2 now (or even 1)
yes BCG should be lvl 2
ptn, scl, and its should be rated [10] imho, for teh community.
ITS , this site should be more than 5
it's very secret , just a lilttle ppl know the link , and how to login
what about BTmusic ??
he should be in lvl4
I agreeQuote:
Originally Posted by TomSawyer
SCC [9] must change to [10] , now they are faster then ScT
Agree with you.Quote:
Originally Posted by predateur
Level 5
ScT [10]
Level 3
SCC [10]
Is adding one point too much to asked for?:huh:
can you guys honestly compare those 2 trackers as equal? ScT offers so much more imo. It has better retention. It backcatalogues pretty much every TV series in many different formats, has tons of unique packs, etc etc..Quote:
Originally Posted by huzhichaoAgree with you.Quote:
Originally Posted by predateur
Level 5
ScT [10]
Level 3
SCC [10]
Is adding one point too much to asked for?:huh:
Maybe their pre-times do match up, but a rating of [9] is very good. I personally don't see those trackers on the same level. The exception is SCC free leech music section, which is easier for me than looking through SCT's music packs. I think [10] should be reserved for only the top sites in each specialization, but if enough of agree that SCC is equal to SCT then it can be changed to [10]. I only use the mp3 section of SCC so unless another mod or the WTAW agrees with you guys then I'll still be open to changes.
On a separate note: can any mac users rate the 2 new mac trackers in relation to brokenstones. preferably a regular here who has account on all 3.
I can understand TL is a [10], but why is RevTT a [10]?Quote:
Originally Posted by T.S.O.L.
how come revtt is 10 and scc is less than 10?
please read Skizo's post before suggesting rating changes: http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-wha.../postcount2271
anyone else think SCC should be rated a perfect 10, or another tracker that should get a higher or lower rating? again, refer to Skizo's examples in that link before asking for a change. The examples may be for changing levels, but you still must provide reasons instead of a simple "+1 ____ tracker should have a [_] rating"
Because...they are both basically the same content wise? You can't really give one a 10 without giving the other the same thing since they're so similar.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGoodI can understand TL is a [10], but why is RevTT a [10]?Quote:
Originally Posted by T.S.O.L.
On another note: I can understand why both TL & RevTT have [10] rankings, but IPT is only a [9]?. When IPT has a shit load more content than the other two.
But as T.S.O.L. mentioned, a [9] is still a good ranking. And I think the rating was bumped from a [7] to a [9] after the last time I said something. So can't really complain. But it's not like bumping from a [9] to a [10] would be a lie.
And no, I don't think SCC should be bumped to a [10]. Yes, the content that SCC has is great, but it doesn't have nearly as much of it as other 0day sites(SCT). So in my opinion a [9] is a correct rating for SCC.
EDIT: Oh wait, RevTT is not a [10]. Well, it should be bumped from a 9 back to a 10(don't see why it went down to a 9, considering all the great content it gets from their excellent Request section).
my thoughts...
tl has better pres, longer retention due to peers, better speed especially older torrents, on a fresh browse page there seems to be so much new content upped.
revtt has a request section.
scc is fine at [9]
Good points. I forgot about the request section when i moved it down one, I was only comparing the number of torrents with TL.Quote:
Originally Posted by Funkin'Because...they are both basically the same content wise? You can't really give one a 10 without giving the other the same thing since they're so similar.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGood
On another note: I can understand why both TL & RevTT have [10] rankings, but IPT is only a [9]?. When IPT has a shit load more content than the other two.
But as T.S.O.L. mentioned, a [9] is still a good ranking. And I think the rating was bumped from a [7] to a [9] after the last time I said something. So can't really complain. But it's not like bumping from a [9] to a [10] would be a lie.
And no, I don't think SCC should be bumped to a [10]. Yes, the content that SCC has is great, but it doesn't have nearly as much of it as other 0day sites(SCT). So in my opinion a [9] is a correct rating for SCC.
EDIT: Oh wait, RevTT is not a [10]. Well, it should be bumped from a 9 back to a 10(don't see why it went down to a 9, considering all the great content it gets from their excellent Request section).
Well, it's a little hard for me to tell exactly how much each of the three sites(IPT, TL, RevTT) actually have. Since none of them have a stats box. I know only the staff at IPT has access to the stats. Not sure about the other two.
But going by just the number of the browse page of each tracker:
TL: 16051-16054
RevTT: 18041-18060
IPT: 25041-25070
So going by the browse page of each trackers, TL actually has the least amount of content. Also to throw, IPT actually has a great request section too. It's not actually a system like RevTT's, it's just a forum. But every single thing I've requested so far there has been uploaded(RevTT too). So the uploaders at both sites are great.
So since all three sites basically contain the same scene content that is always uploaded, each have their own exclusive content that has been uploaded from requests. So in my opinion all three should have a [10] content rating(which actually I see RevTT was bumped back up).
I am sorry but I wonder:
Why IPT is green, and why TL, scc, revtt are dark red?
Don't you think they all have similar content?
read the first post completely
Your answer:Quote:
Originally Posted by wasaby
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTAW
Elektronik should be at least level 4 in my opinion.
yeh they don't have much invites floating around.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dretskol
@bout the TL, don't forget that TL doesn't have xxx :)
WTAW update czone's stats.
i updated here the review
http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bit...5742/page4/#33
Snowtigers is harder to obtain (by far) than Ethor...
I don't get who would be retarded to trade waffles for what.cd, what.cd is definitely better...
It's all subjective .. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by phosphors
No, waffles is complete bullshit crap, there is NO WAY anyone will trade it for what.cd....Quote:
Originally Posted by GekkoIt's all subjective .. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by phosphors
ScT for level 6.