Do you own a gun?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Agreed.

They also had no weapon to do shit with since it was nonexistent.

I would try my best to scamper to 1 of 6. I still may not make it.

Gotta try though. ;)

---

It's still a gamble since... well you know what I'm gonna' say, so let's just pretend we had this debate again.


It's an odds thing, you think the odds of the gun getting you killed are smaller than the risk of someone homicidal breaking in.

I think the odds are favour of the reversed.


It's really what this entire debate is about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GepperRankins

you provoke a shootout. theres no risk for me unless its just an armed crazy person who wants to kill me. theres less of them than armed burglars i reckon, so you're more likely to die.



yeah i know. i'm just saying it doesn't mean all people who would use a gun to kill someone would use a pipe or baseball bat if they couldn't get a gun

---

Really, what were wars fought with before firearms ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

But RP.....

[sarcasm]If we outlawed guns, they wouldn't have them.....especially in America. [/sarcasm]

---

yeah very funny.


let the gangs kill each other. if the graph is wieghted by them and not you you're safe aren't you

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GepperRankins

you provoke a shootout. theres no risk for me unless its just an armed crazy person who wants to kill me. theres less of them than armed burglars i reckon, so you're more likely to die.



yeah i know. i'm just saying it doesn't mean all people who would use a gun to kill someone would use a pipe or baseball bat if they couldn't get a gun

---

Riiiiight....and you know that the intruder is armed? :lol: :lol:

You also know whether he has a gun versus a baseball bat. :lol: :lol:

Furthermore, if he does have a baseball bat everything's cool because it ain't a gun. :lol: :lol:

btw I minimize chances of shoot outs by maximizing my target area and minimize being a target

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RPerry

Really, what were wars fought with before firearms ?

---

oh so theres a war going on in america?

we aren't talking about wars here, we're talking about fights. theres a difference, if there were no guns and someone did you wrong you'd give them a good hiding.

with a gun its easier to just shoot them and kill them

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

.... shot in the ass

---

I thought you wouldn't shot someone in the back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GepperRankins

oh so theres a war going on in america?

---

Several of them actually, War on drugs, War on Terrorism..... we have all kinds of wars, depending on who's elected President :blink:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GepperRankins

oh so theres a war going on in america?

we aren't talking about wars here, we're talking about fights. theres a difference, if there were no guns and someone did you wrong you'd give them a good hiding.

with a gun its easier to just shoot them and kill them

---

I have to agree there.

Columbine might have been isolated to a home where the victims were beaten with baseball bats and wouldn't have been at school.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

I thought you wouldn't shot someone in the back.

---

Correct(ol). It's in the ass.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Dude I have been in room full-o-folks that packed guns and couldn't have been in the least bit nervous.

They all had "instant death" in their coats. :dry:

---

Entry in "sad post of the year" contest.