Why would that be a bad thing?Quote:
Originally Posted by DuDutchy
Also, Gazelle is very good.
Printable View
Why would that be a bad thing?Quote:
Originally Posted by DuDutchy
Also, Gazelle is very good.
If they keep going this way i don't think so...
The latest torrents...
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/c10b197807.jpg
The site just takes a while to update. Theres been loads of times I've started newly uploaded torrents that the site says have 0 seeds, when they actually had 5 or 6 snatches already.Quote:
Originally Posted by joyNt
joyNt, the case was exactly the same with OiNK aswell. and what Trippin' said is correct :)
It's good to hear then :)
Nope....Not Even Close but it will do:cry:
Content wise hell to the no.
Coding/feature wise, hell yes.
As i was only a member at OiNK for a few weeks before it was taken down, i may remember it wrong, but wasn't the number of torrents around 200k at the end? What.CD has 290k torrents today so either i remember it wrong, or i have no idea what you're talking about?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cradle
Yeah that's right. 200,000 torrents, 180,000 members
na nothing can compare to oink, dont get me wrong i think what is great but the original is always the best. Also i find there are more bugs on what compared to what there ever was on oink. Also i would agree that its much harder to seed on what. One last point if oink had never shut down do u really think people would have switched to a what.cd or waffles???