Printable View
It's not!!!Quote:
Originally posted by AfterBurn@28 September 2003 - 18:46
I think this user's avatar is gross: http://www.klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showuser=25756.
Why is it considered acceptable to show male genitalia but not female?
http://www.funpic.hu/ad/ad631.gif
Fixed.
nice sig Amarjit :beerchug:
I finally got my scanner going and uploaded a Sig scanned from a holiday snap. This seemed like an appropriate thread to test it in.
Does it offend anyone?
edit: a question - how do you keep the text to the right of the image? I thought that I'd done that, obviously I missed something.
It doesn't offend me at all, there isn't much that does, to be honest. I can see why some would be offended by hardcore porn images, but simple inoccuous photos of the human form are nothing to get upset about, in my opinion.Quote:
Originally posted by BCCorn@5 October 2003 - 19:04
I finally got my scanner going and uploaded a Sig scanned from a holiday snap. This seemed like an appropriate thread to test it in.
Does it offend anyone?
edit: a question - how do you keep the text to the right of the image? I thought that I'd done that, obviously I missed something.
I don't know about how to keep your text to the right of the pic, but maybe add some html to the text? Or make the text into an image. The size of the window is obviously causing your text to wrap.
I am not offended by it,just think it looks poor and amateurish.That is just my opinion though. :DQuote:
Originally posted by BCCorn@5 October 2003 - 19:04
I finally got my scanner going and uploaded a Sig scanned from a holiday snap. This seemed like an appropriate thread to test it in.
Does it offend anyone?
edit: a question - how do you keep the text to the right of the image? I thought that I'd done that, obviously I missed something.
Yeah, I can see what you mean, compared to a lot of Sigs it IS poor and amateurish. Basically, I AM an amateur, both in IT and in photography.Quote:
Originally posted by N£MO@6 October 2003 - 00:24
I am not offended by it,just think it looks poor and amateurish.That is just my opinion though. :D
The difference is that a lot of Sigs tend to be pictures of celebrities/porn stars that the user has never met. I took that picture in my hotel room last Christmas morning, it's of a Thai GoGo dancer that I was seeing at that time. That's the reason that her face isn't on the picture, she isn't a professional and wouldn't appreciate having her face on the net (I hav a LOT of photos of her, I just couldn't post most of them here). Now every time that I see it I'm reminded of her. :)
To my mind that beats having an image of some star as a Sig. Look at the picture again and imagine waking up with her beside you on Christmas day, I did exactly that last year. There are worse ways to spend Christmas morning!!
enough with the sigs if they want to show tits then shoe em!
i was told i could not show tits and had to remove my avatarhttp://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/1/slookani.gif
BCCorn, is that ANOTHER NikkiD pic?
:lol: :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: roflmao :lol:Quote:
Originally posted by Rat Faced@6 October 2003 - 13:01
BCCorn, is that ANOTHER NikkiD pic?
:lol: :lol: