i cannot say that my reaseach is net based, i also think you over looked the subjectivity of quantitive reaseach, and this is what i was attempting (but obviously failed to highlight in my commemt about not being a nutritionist), i however i can not help people that take on selective reading of comments,Quote:
Originally posted by Lamsey@5 November 2003 - 00:23
She, like me, is fed up with people spouting utter and complete codswallop and then saying "oh, I'm not a nutritionist you know" in their defence.
5 seconds on Google and you could have checked that fact before you posted it.
"people judge a book from its cover and then read what they want between selected lines" - axl rose
i further expanded my point by arguing that be all (with the exemption of those that take tablets) suffer diffencies.
i'm very sorry you feel this way lamsey, i do not feel it was an appropriate way for her to express herself, however i recall this is a disccusion forum which means everyone's input is added, the inevitable outcome is people make up their own minds, whilst reading your posts i am sure you do not disagree with this priniciple, but active and valued disscussion can only take place where openess and general level of common courtesy are observed.
The words "shut the fuck up" do in no way remind me of civilised conversation or are they any way related to the common courtesy one expects in conversation, if my offence to her comments is unfounded, albeit, i can't see how they are.
Isn't it a pity that in a disscussion about vegterianism (the treatment of animals), we lose our civilised expression to our fellow man?
