yup
Printable View
yup
i like ALTO MP3 maker:)
<Removed>
I've tried EAC given all the positive coverage it gets from the all the mp3 enthusiast sites (this one included) but when you could choose between ripping at 30 - 40x or 1.8 - 2.4x (inner-outer, same CD) there is no choice surely? Yes, audiograbber works perfectly fine for me, its quicker, easier to use and infinately more user friendly. Take the time it listen to the music once ripped to ensure there are no skips/distortions - and if there is then use EAC. From experience I've found that you can tell when audiograbber will possibly struggle ripping a track 100%; it slows down to a much slower than normal ripping rate. You could count the times this has happened in one hand, over 2 years! I guess if you take good care of your CDs (or your freinds take good care of theirs!) you'll be minimising any potential problems.
still using audiograbber, but i doubt that prog is still the latest in town
im using Cdex its a cool warez...
oh no I'm still on audiograbber :O
i use EAC to rip
lame 3.97 w/ V0 as the preset to compress
i had to use guides to set it all up but i'm so glad i did
it's what they recommend on places like oink
you should be using -V2 --vbr-new
It produces better quality faster than vbr old
I'm using foobar2000, because I like listening music by this player =)
:P No thanks.dbpoweramp always for me.224 Bitrate(even though 192 is still good and really should be doing them at 256 or 320) CBR STEREO encoded with Lame 3.93.If you do not like it then do not have to Download it.I made them for my Ears anyways. :P
;) These Guides are for the Noobs.The rest of us our set in our ways.