Quote:
Originally posted by SnnY+10 August 2004 - 21:41--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SnnY @ 10 August 2004 - 21:41)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> I, and others posting yesterday, had half a notion at least that we'd cease to be even if we copied ourselves, that we wouldn't be here to experience things even as the new copy was walking around. At least purely from our point of view.
I felt I'd be dead if if the information in my brain was copied, and the copy continued instead of me, whereas brenda suggested that the entire body is part of one's conciousness, which might mean that a new body wouldn't be you, either.
Would your answers mean that both of you, ck-uk and manker might be able to deal with the kind of world I described in my initial post?
<!--QuoteBegin-Re the book altered carbon
It's this sci-fi novel set in a distant future where people have these sort of hard-drives called cortical stacks in their necks.
Basically, it defines what is human.
When you go to prison, your mind, uploaded from the cortical stack, gets put on storage.
And unless you can afford to pay for the storage of your body, a prisoner released from the same prison may get downloaded in your body, referred to as a "sleeve".
The question is, and I have been thinking a lot about this, whether you would still be you.
I mean, don't we consider ourselves to be our brains, in a manner of speaking?
This was my first thought, which means one would get killed every time one would swap bodies, as the mind in that body gets replaced with that of the new occupant.
But it's more than that, in the book the protagonist also looks at other bodies, and it seems to me he's thinking about them as one would a car, "is it modified", "tuned up" and so forth.
So it seems to me that he identifies himself by the information in his hard-drive rather than that in his mind.
EDit: form. [/b][/quote]