Is it time?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

If all the mentalists stopped using the interweb, I'd be gutted :D

---

How would you know :naughty:

Let him stay then, we can link noobs to his posts and say that's what not to do, like I said. And also, I can't argue about the entertainment value.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnnY

Let him stay then, we can link noobs to his posts and say that's what not to do, like I said. And also, I can't argue about the entertainment value.

---

I like it -- Look, kids - do you really want to post like him.

Just think of him as the forum pinata.




Edit: Note I am ignoring JP as I think he's BoB!1! and as such got my mate Dave into trouble :ph34r:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

If all the mentalists stopped using the interweb, I'd be gutted :D

---

How would you know :naughty:

---

His Internet Access would have been curtailed. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Edit: Note I am ignoring JP as I think he's BoB!1! and as such got my mate Dave into trouble :ph34r:

---

:lol: irl

arsefecker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rat Faced

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

How would you know :naughty:

---

His Internet Access would have been curtailed. :rolleyes:

---

Indeed.

Of course, before exercising any ban on the grounds that someone is a banned member in disguise, we have to be reasonably convinced that he actually is that member. In this case I am, others may not be.

There may be other grounds for banning the person however, but I'm not certain that we have reached that point. Yet. But I feel confident he will provide us with sufficient reason before too long.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lynx

Of course, before exercising any ban on the grounds that someone is a banned member in disguise, we have to be reasonably convinced that he actually is that member. In this case I am, others may not be.

There may be other grounds for banning the person however, but I'm not certain that we have reached that point. Yet. But I feel confident he will provide us with sufficient reason before too long.

---

Is being a tit not enough then.

Oh wait, no never mind, I take that back.

:whistle:

Ban him again. I don't want other banned members popping back now, like Gungrave or Rapfan. Gungrave because he was a nob and Rapfan because he was so very depressing.

Anyone who doesn't notice a six-page thread devoted to them should be banned on principle anyhow.

I'm totally against this ban but for different reasons than manker.

There ain't no fucking proof besides a hint of posting style. :dry:

If it was definitely proven is him then of course ban him. Just because others have been brought back, it doesn't mean resurrection is deemed okay for all.

Simply put, if one can hide their IP and not announce themselves as a former banned member...unfortunately they have a new life in the Witness Protection Program and should be left alone.

Use the logic. "It seems like it's him" ain't enough.