Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chip Monk

What's all this spam about love and relationships.

It's a simple question ffs. Is there any scientific justification for the penis being inserted into the anus. Is it a natural thing to do. Surely the simple answer is no, it's not a natural thing to do. It is therefore an un-natural act, or to put it another way, wrong.

You can use all the mumbo-jumbo you want to justify it. That changes nowt, people are performing an un-natural act for their carnal gratification..

---

Speaking of mumbo-jumbo, some cawk earlier in the thread said that oral sex wasn't wrong because the mouth was also an 'in door'.

I contend that in a certain circumstance, the arse functions perfectly well as an 'in door'.

Peristalsis must work both ways as turtle-heading is a time honoured practice in the art of avoiding shitting yourself.

Therefore if anal sex is wrong (as per thread title), oral sex must be too.

Ah, the misinformed using poorly understood science in support of their specious arguments. One of my all time favourite things.

Peristalsis is involuntary muscular movement, the fact that you may assist by a bit of voluntary downward force is not peristalsis. The retreival of a turd, via the gift of the cheek clench is also not peristalsis.

The arse is not an in door, it may be occasional used (by some deviants) as a temporary holding area, however it is not a proper way in. There is no normal biological function which requres anything being inserted. I preclude medical examination or treatment, obviousement.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chip Monk

Ah, the misinformed using poorly understood science in support of their specious arguments. One of my all time favourite things.

Peristalsis is involuntary muscular movement, the fact that you may assist by a bit of voluntary downward force is not peristalsis. The retreival of a turd, via the gift of the cheek clench is also not peristalsis.

The arse is not an in door, it may be occasional used (by some deviants) as a temporary holding area, however it is not a proper way in. There is no normal biological function which requres anything being inserted. I preclude medical examination or treatment, obviousement.

---

Two whole paragraphs about misusing a single word.

Ah, misdirection. One of my all time ... .

Anyway. If using your arse as an 'in door' while performing the turtle-head manouvre isn't wrong then your arse can be described as an 'in door' in certain circumstances, ergo - according to the logic supplied in an earlier post - anal sex isn't wrong.

Simply put, if a mouthful of cawk can be described as 'not wrong' soley because the mouth can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door'. Then an arseful of cawk can also be described as 'not wrong' because the arse can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door'.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chip Monk

What's all this spam about love and relationships.

It's a simple question ffs. Is there any scientific justification for the penis being inserted into the anus. Is it a natural thing to do. Surely the simple answer is no, it's not a natural thing to do. It is therefore an un-natural act, or to put it another way, wrong.

You can use all the mumbo-jumbo you want to justify it. That changes nowt, people are performing an un-natural act for their carnal gratification..

---

Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .. That was asking for trouble.

... in the end who cares...as long as they keep it out of my anus...

ears are almost exclusively an in-door, but only the extremely enthusiastic would contemplate inserting their cawk into one.

I'm not buying into the "in-door" "out-door" analogy.

Oral sex performs a function, especially during foreplay, because the saliva lubricates the cawk into a heightened state of arousal in preparedness for the great vaginal escapade to follow.

Deep-throating is of course not especially conducive to this function, and is entirely a matter for the participants in question.

So, enlighten me, what would the normal, natural function be, which involved the arse as a way of getting things into the body. As stated earlier, this isn't a moral judgement we're talking about here, so try not to use those tricks again. Were talking biology.

The arse is used to get ........... into the body. This function is used in order to allow us to ........... Please fill in the blanks for me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thewizeard

Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .. That was asking for trouble.

---

Intelligent Design... :whistling

Feck me,shouldn't this be in the drawing room.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thewizeard

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chip Monk

What's all this spam about love and relationships.

It's a simple question ffs. Is there any scientific justification for the penis being inserted into the anus. Is it a natural thing to do. Surely the simple answer is no, it's not a natural thing to do. It is therefore an un-natural act, or to put it another way, wrong.

You can use all the mumbo-jumbo you want to justify it. That changes nowt, people are performing an un-natural act for their carnal gratification..

---

Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .

---

Gravity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chip Monk

So, enlighten me, what would the normal, natural function be, which involved the arse as a way of getting things into the body. As stated earlier, this isn't a moral judgement we're talking about here, so try not to use those tricks again. Were talking biology.

The arse is used to get ........... into the body. This function is used in order to allow us to ........... Please fill in the blanks for me.

---

Oh deary me :no2:

I don't think anal nor oral sex is a normal, natural biological function to get stuff into the body. I've never said I did. A chap earlier implied disagreement with this statement in its entirety purely because of the 'in door' nature of the mouth.

I mentioned it not because I disagreed with your, Chip Monk's, post but because you mentioned mumbo-jumbo and it put me in mind of it.


I think I'll post this sentence again for no other reason than it's particularly well constructed and I'm rather fond of it; "Simply put, if a mouthful of cawk can be described as 'not wrong' soley because the mouth can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door'. Then an arseful of cawk can also be described as 'not wrong' because the arse can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door' ".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gripper

Feck me,shouldn't this be in the drawing room.

---

Nah, most of the posts here are full of shit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gripper

Feck me,shouldn't this be in the drawing room.

---

Nah, most of the posts here are full of shit.

---

So shouldn't this be in the drawing room?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nigel

Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .

---

So you can PPK a girl without digital dislocation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barbarossa

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Nah, most of the posts here are full of shit.

---

So shouldn't this be in the drawing room?

---

No.

I was actually implementing a clever play on words, I meant 'shit' as in fecal matter. This thread shouldn't be in the Drawing Room as the thought of other folk defacating makes those straight laced republican folk nauseous.

One must have consideration for even the anally retentive :smilie4:

Live and let Live i say, :smoke: not for me but eh if ya dig it get on wi it. Watch out for the prolapses though eh, need to measure the amount you bugger each other irekons, 2 much goin up & it falls out, i know ive seen the video!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chip Monk

So, enlighten me, what would the normal, natural function be, which involved the arse as a way of getting things into the body. As stated earlier, this isn't a moral judgement we're talking about here, so try not to use those tricks again. Were talking biology.

The arse is used to get ........... into the body. This function is used in order to allow us to ........... Please fill in the blanks for me.

---

Oh deary me :no2:

I don't think anal nor oral sex is a normal, natural biological function to get stuff into the body. I've never said I did. A chap earlier implied disagreement with this statement in its entirety purely because of the 'in door' nature of the mouth.

I mentioned it not because I disagreed with your, Chip Monk's, post but because you mentioned mumbo-jumbo and it put me in mind of it.


I think I'll post this sentence again for no other reason than it's particularly well constructed and I'm rather fond of it; "Simply put, if a mouthful of cawk can be described as 'not wrong' soley because the mouth can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door'. Then an arseful of cawk can also be described as 'not wrong' because the arse can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door' ".

---

Ladies and Gentlemen, witness the Magnificent Slimeo. A man with a mind as slippery as an oiled racing snake. :simile:

You knows it ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nigel

Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .

---

So you can PPK a girl without digital dislocation.

---

Wrong:no2:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Bible

And God said unto Barry, "Why are you still having casual sex with a woman in her vagina? I put an entrance right next to it which carries no risk of accidental pregnancy! Honestly..."

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Bible

And God said unto Barry, "Why are you still having casual sex with a woman in her vagina? I put an entrance right next to it which carries no risk of accidental pregnancy! Honestly..."

---

---

I've told you, it's an exit, not an entry.

Typical of you people to try to twist things with your religious prejudices and the ignoring of science.

If you practice turtle-heading enough, you can get it down to a fine art.

As everyone knows, art is a science - therefore, your arse being an entry can actually be thought of as scientific :smilie4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

If you practice turtle-heading enough, you can get it down to a fine art.

As everyone knows, art is a science - therefore, your arse being an entry can actually be thought of as scientific :smilie4:

---

Well, now you've explained it properly I can see what you're saying.

Sorry for the musunderstanding, I take it all back.

/Moved to Lounge as the issue is resolved.

..surely "Funny Stuff" would be more appropriate ..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chip Monk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

---

I've told you, it's an exit, not an entry.

Typical of you people to try to twist things with your religious prejudices and the ignoring of science.

---

Are you saying god doesn't exist?:shocked:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chip Monk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

If you practice turtle-heading enough, you can get it down to a fine art.

As everyone knows, art is a science - therefore, your arse being an entry can actually be thought of as scientific :smilie4:

---

Well, now you've explained it properly I can see what you're saying.

Sorry for the musunderstanding, I take it all back.

/Moved to Lounge as the issue is resolved.

---

It was the smiley that cleared up the confunction once and for all, wasn't it.

I don't care if the arse is an 'in door', an 'out door' or both. I don't think nature comes into it, if you want to be completely natural take of all your cloths and go live in a cave. No processed food, no toothpaste, no contraception, no shopping, no computers, etc. etc. :dabs:

/moved to apathyworld

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl

I don't think nature comes into it

---

How would one decide on what is unnatural without in some way examining nature. That's just mad talk.

It's people like you bringing morality into it which spoils things.

Well then, the question is: Are unnatural acts wrong?

I say hell no, I like my computer and I want to get my nose pierced.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl

Well then, the question is: Are unnatural acts wrong?

---

I pray to God that you inserted that colon in an ironic manner.

I:m 15: I:ll put: :colon:s wherever: I se:e fit:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl

I:m 15: I:ll put: :colon:s wherever: I se:e fit:

---

OOooooooooooooooo

http://www.funkist.ca/images/product...%20handbag.jpg

I want to burn that bag.

So long as you don't put it in someone's colon.

That's an awful joke.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl

That's an offal joke.

---

:lol:

So was that.

Arrrrrgse jokes ahoy! Off the starboard bow.

Oh sorry, I thought you were making that joke.

Even if I was you shouldn't have laughed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl

Even if I was you shouldn't have laughed.

---

I though it rather good, even if you weren't making it.