I would like to argue something pretty important to me.

I'm not saying they haven't done a good job, they've done an excellent job.

What I'm trying to get at is that all could have been prevented, and these nutters arrested nearly 4 years ago... It's sad that the British police have only started acting after the blow... :(

Were they going to start investigating the bombings before they happened then? :blink:

Time-machine anyone?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tralalala

What I'm trying to get at is that all could have been prevented, and these nutters arrested nearly 4 years ago...

---

Please to be explaining. Your point (whatever it is) interests me strangely.

What happened in 2001 that could have possibly alarmed the world that Muslims were trying to target the West?

I'm sure anyone can answer this.....

I mean, there are over 1 million Muslims in the UK, some being extreme... I think that the UK could have, and should have done more to prevent the bombings....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tralalala

What I'm trying to get at is that all could have been prevented, and these nutters arrested nearly 4 years ago... It's sad that the British police have only started acting after the blow... :(

---

Our PreCog units aren't as advanced as yours I guess.

It doesn't need to be "advanced". All that needed to be done was to put the level of security to a higher one... Don't you think it would have been better for all if the 7/7/05 would be remembered as simply another day of the year...?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tralalala

It doesn't need to be "advanced". All that needed to be done was to put the level of security to a higher one... Don't you think it would have been better for all if the 7/7/05 would be remembered as simply another day of the year...?

---

The security was higher and we still had bomb attempts on the 21st. Extra security doesn't mean these things can be prevented.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tralalala

What happened in 2001 that could have possibly alarmed the world that Muslims were trying to target the West?

---

Can you not refer to them as terrorists or some other term that isn't offensive to the overwhelming majority of Muslims who want nothing to do with the actions enacted in the name of their religion. It would make you sound less prejudiced.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tralalala

It doesn't need to be "advanced". All that needed to be done was to put the level of security to a higher one... Don't you think it would have been better for all if the 7/7/05 would be remembered as simply another day of the year...?

---

The security was higher and we still had bomb attempts on the 21st. Extra security doesn't mean these things can be prevented.

---

Wow there boy...

If more security can't prevent bombers, why not just get rid of them..????


Come on, you must agree that with armed guards down in the Tubes would definately have made these bombers' jobs much more difficult don't you think?


@your second comment... OK, you're right, I shall refer to them as the Muslim Terrorists from now on.

Quote:

---

@your second comment... OK, you're right, I shall refer to them as the Muslim Terrorists from now on.

---

Why not just "terrorists"?