Re: Bush's immigration policy
Well, I don't think there was much point in saying that RF believes that every minimum wage earner supports a family nor implying that if a person breaks the law when (s)he is penniless, (s)he is just as likely to continue in the same vein when comfortable.
I wouldn't say that those absolutes are well-warranted. I would go so far as to say that they are quite ridiculous.
Re: Bush's immigration policy
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
I wouldn't say that those absolutes are well-warranted. I would go so far as to say that they are quite ridiculous.
Alright; just which absolutes are you referring to?
Re: Bush's immigration policy
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
I wouldn't say that those absolutes are well-warranted. I would go so far as to say that they are quite ridiculous.
Alright; just which absolutes are you referring to?
The ones in the same post as the one you took that quote from :lookaroun
Re: Bush's immigration policy
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Alright; just which absolutes are you referring to?
The ones in the same post as the one you took that quote from :lookaroun
I do hope you will forgive my apparent intransigence, manker; I find it more than a bit difficult to believe you think my construct an absolute but somehow (willfully?) overlooked Rat's in order to attempt to tag me...
Have I reduced you to picking nits?
Re: Bush's immigration policy
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
The ones in the same post as the one you took that quote from :lookaroun
I do hope you will forgive my apparent intransigence, manker; I find it more than a bit difficult to believe you think
my construct an absolute but somehow (willfully?) overlooked Rat's in order to attempt to tag me...
Have I reduced you to picking nits?
How did I overlook what RF said. I replied to him too.
I thought you were both talking a load of rubbish.
I only commented on your second sweeping generalisation because you adressed me.
Honestly, sometimes I really do think that you have a persecution complex.
Re: Bush's immigration policy
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
I do hope you will forgive my apparent intransigence, manker; I find it more than a bit difficult to believe you think my construct an absolute but somehow (willfully?) overlooked Rat's in order to attempt to tag me...
Have I reduced you to picking nits?
How did I overlook what RF said.
I replied to him too.
I thought you were both talking a load of rubbish.
I only commented on your second sweeping generalisation because you adressed
me.
Honestly, sometimes I really do think that you have a persecution complex.
Well, damn, man-of course we were talking rubbish-what did you think we were doing?
Honestly, you are such a manker-come-lately...
And a persecution complex?
Me?
With my history here?
Why would I, of all people, have a persecution complex?
Silly boy.
Re: Bush's immigration policy
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
How did I overlook what RF said.
I replied to him too.
I thought you were both talking a load of rubbish.
I only commented on your second sweeping generalisation because you adressed
me.
Honestly, sometimes I really do think that you have a persecution complex.
Well, damn, man-of course we were talking rubbish-what did you
think we were doing?
Honestly, you are such a
manker-come-lately...
And a persecution complex?
Me?
With
my history here?
Why would I, of all people, have a persecution complex?
Silly boy.
I thought you were both talking rubbish, which you've just confirmed. I think I said that. I made my point about your pointless absolutes when you adressed me with one of them, you said they were well-warranted so I enlightened you to their folly.
It seems you agree.
Then you said that I picked on you and not RF, like the big meany that I am - so I thought I'd better set you straight there too.
As for the persecution complex ... yeah, I was kidding. Of course you don't think everyone on the board is out to get you :ermm:
Re: Bush's immigration policy
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Well, damn, man-of course we were talking rubbish-what did you think we were doing?
Honestly, you are such a manker-come-lately...
And a persecution complex?
Me?
With my history here?
Why would I, of all people, have a persecution complex?
Silly boy.
I
thought you were both talking rubbish, which you've just confirmed. I think I said that. I made my point about your pointless absolutes when you adressed me with one of them, you said they were well-warranted so I enlightened you to their folly.
It seems you agree.
Then you said that I picked on you and not RF, like the big meany that I am - so I thought I'd better set you straight there too.
As for the persecution complex ... yeah, I was kidding. Of course you don't think everyone on the board is out to get you :ermm:
Just so we're clear, I advised that Rat seemed to buy a common liberal generalization about minimum-wage earners over here.
This nonsense about abuse of absolutes is tish and pish.
I think the Prince Regent said that alot, doesn't he? ;)
Re: Bush's immigration policy
No such thing as absolutes...
However..
$200 per week wages
$650 per month rent...
Doesnt leave a lot for the unimportant things like food and heating.. :P
Re: Bush's immigration policy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Faced
No such thing as absolutes...
However..
$200 per week wages
$650 per month rent...
Doesnt leave a lot for the unimportant things like food and heating.. :P
And where did those figures come from?
