Re: is filesharingtalk a classed as a 'warez' site?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tesco
Quote:
Originally Posted by
djkemp1
yes thats what im trying to say, a bit further up someone said that nzb's are fine but torrents aren't so why would nzb's not be classed as warez when torrents are?
Not sure.
IMO, Torrents
are fine.
The only reason we don't allow torrents here is because of all the heat on torrent sites. RIAA sueing and stuff.
They don't go after NZB sites (yet).;)
I think usenet got some trouble recently .;)
Re: is filesharingtalk a classed as a 'warez' site?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
abosamer
I think usenet got some trouble recently .;)
Nope. Usenet.com got into trouble. And that was because they were stupid as fuck.
Re: is filesharingtalk a classed as a 'warez' site?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Skiz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
abosamer
I think usenet got some trouble recently .;)
Nope. Usenet.com got into trouble. And that was because they were stupid as fuck.
lol What is the difference between got some and got into ? they seems have the same meanings to me :P
??
Re: is filesharingtalk classed as a 'warez' site?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
abosamer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Skiz
Nope. Usenet.com got into trouble. And that was because they were stupid as fuck.
lol What is the difference between got some and got into ? they seems have the same meanings to me :P
??
The difference Skiz was talking about was not between got some and got into. It was between Usenet in general (which you were referring to) and Usenet.com (which is a site that provides usenet access). That is the site that got some, got into, trouble. Not usenet in general.
Re: is filesharingtalk classed as a 'warez' site?
If you live in somewhere like North Korea, Yes :)